IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkbw/31.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Schrader, Klaus
  • Laaser, Claus-Friedrich

Abstract

In der Studie, die im Rahmen des nordwärts-Projekts erstellt wurde, wird das in Norddeutschland zu beobachtende Gefälle bei der Wirtschaftskraft mit strukturellen Ursachen erklärt. Aufgrund der relativ hohen Wachstumsbeiträge des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes und der unternehmensnahen Dienstleistungen bleiben die industrieschwachen Flächenländer Schleswig-Holstein und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern hinter dem Bundesdurchschnitt zurück, woran auch die Schwäche der Industrie während Pandemie und abflauender Weltkonjunktur wenig ändert. Die Autoren zeigen, dass diese grundlegenden Zusammenhänge der Wirtschaftsentwicklung auch in Dänemark zu beobachten sind, wo hinter der deutsch-dänischen Grenze in Jütland das industrielles Zentrum Dänemarks liegt. Trotz struktureller Unterschiede ergeben sich in der deutsch-dänischen Nachbarschaft relevante industrielle Schnittstellen auf Branchenebene, etwa bei Ernährung und Maschinenbau. Eine regional tiefergehende Analyse auf Kreisebene zeigt, dass in Schleswig-Holstein die regionale Bedeutung des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in den Kreisen des Hamburger Umlands am größten ist, während im Landesteil Schleswig, aber auch im östlichen Holstein die Industrie ein geringes Gewicht hat. Erst in den jütländischen Festlandsregionen ist der Industrialisierungsgrad wieder deutlich höher. Die Unterschiede bei den Wirtschaftsstrukturen in der deutsch-dänischen Grenzregion werden auch mit der Landesgrenze als regulativer Trennmauer erklärt. Die Autoren empfehlen eine stärkere wirtschaftspolitische Kooperation, die Ansatzpunkte in der industrienahen Bildungslandschaft, der Wirtschaftsförderung und der Regulierungspraxis finden könnte.

Suggested Citation

  • Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2020. "Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 31, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/226031/1/1737434814.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert C. Feenstra & James R. Markusen & Andrew K. Rose, 2001. "Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 430-447, May.
    2. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2019. "Unterschiede in der Wirtschaftsentwicklung im Norden und Süden Deutschlands," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Soltwedel, Rüdiger & Bickenbach, Frank & Sichelschmidt, Henning & Wolf, Hartmut, 2008. "Neue Wege der Kooperation: Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg in einer gemeinsamen Wirtschaftsregion," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    5. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2006. "The Log of Gravity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(4), pages 641-658, November.
    6. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2019. "Schleswig-Holsteins Wirtschaft in Zeiten des Aufschwungs - eine Bestandsaufnahme," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 21, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Raddatz, Claudio, 2016. "Comparative advantage, international trade, and fertility," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-66.
    2. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    3. Chen, Natalie & Novy, Dennis, 2008. "International Trade Integration: A Disaggregated Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 7103, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Brülhart, Marius & Trionfetti, Federico, 2009. "A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 830-845, October.
    5. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A., 2007. "Comparative advantage, demand for external finance, and financial development," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 796-834, December.
    6. Cardamone, Paola, 2007. "A Survey of the Assessments of the Effectiveness of Preferential Trade Agreements using Gravity Models," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 60(4), pages 421-473.
    7. Cecilio R. Tamarit Escalona & Estrella Gómez, 2011. "The euro effect on trade: evidence in gravity equations using panel cointegration techniques," Working Papers. Serie EC 2011-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    8. A Salim, Ruhu & Mahfuz Kabir, Mohammad, 2011. "Does More Trade Potential Remain in Arab States of the Gulf ?," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 26, pages 217-243.
    9. Raphaël Chiappini, 2016. "Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 403-425, June.
    10. White, Roger & Tadesse, Bedassa, 2008. "Immigrants, cultural distance and U.S. state-level exports of cultural products," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 331-348, December.
    11. Hendy, Rana & Zaki, Chahir, 2021. "Trade facilitation and firms exports: Evidence from customs data," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 197-209.
    12. Felix Groba, 2014. "Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the porter hypothesis?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 503-526, February.
    13. Martinez-Zarzoso Inma & Márquez-Ramos Laura, 2008. "The Effect of Trade Facilitation on Sectoral Trade," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-46, September.
    14. Zongo, Amara, 2020. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Food Trade," MPRA Paper 101658, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m01g1j1k2 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Dennis Novy, 2013. "Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs With Panel Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 101-121, January.
    17. Fracasso, Andrea, 2014. "A gravity model of virtual water trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 215-228.
    18. Tamaş Anca, 2020. "Why should the gravity model be taught in business education?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 422-433, July.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m01g1j1k2 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. F. Karam & C. Zaki, 2013. "On the determinants of trade in services: evidence from the MENA region," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(33), pages 4662-4676, November.
    21. Jacks, David S. & Meissner, Christopher M. & Novy, Dennis, 2011. "Trade booms, trade busts, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 185-201, March.
    22. Karam, Fida & Zaki, Chahir, 2019. "Why Don’t MENA Countries Trade More? The Curse of Deficient Institutions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 56-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.