IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iamodp/14881.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost of compliance with the aquis communautaire in the Hungarian dairy sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kiss, Piroska
  • Weingarten, Peter

Abstract

The implementation and enforcement of the acquis communautaire is a precondition for joining the European Union (EU). However, there is only little information on the compliance costs in the acceding countries. In this paper, the investment needs and annual costs of compliance with the part of the acquis communautaire relevant for the dairy sector is assessed at different stages of the agri-food chain in Hungary. The assessment is mainly based on a classification of farms and processors according to their level of compliance with EU standards concerning milk hygiene in 2000/01 and calculations of necessary investments in buildings, milking and cooling facilities and delivery trucks. The raw milk quality in Hungary has steadily improved since the early 1990's. In 1999, 78 % of the milk delivered to processors was in compliance with EU standards. Based on the farm structure in the reference period, the further necessary modernisation requires investments of 82 million euro causing annual compliance costs of 9 million euro or 0.1 up to 4.3 cent per litre milk. This is equivalent to 0.6 % up to 17.9 % of the average farm gate price for milk in 2000. For modernising the milk collection centres, 25 million euro are needed, and for the delivery trucks between 12 million euro and 17 million euro. Depending on the size of the milk processor and the current level of compliance, the annual compliance costs are estimated to be low, ranging from negligible 0.02 cent per litre up to 0.7 cent per litre. Based on these findings there is only limited need for the government to support the further modernisation of milk processors. State support is more relevant at the farm level. Since 68 % of the total investment needs estimated at farm level are accounted for by farms with less than 5 cows, agricultural policy should support these farmers either to considerably increase their herd size or to cease production.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiss, Piroska & Weingarten, Peter, 2003. "Cost of compliance with the aquis communautaire in the Hungarian dairy sector," IAMO Discussion Papers 55, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:14881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/28580/1/38780076X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panayotova, Milena & Adler, Jens, 1999. "Development and future perspectives for Bulgarian raw milk production towards EU quality standards," IAMO Discussion Papers 19, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. D.A. Dziegielewska, 2000. "How Much Does It Cost to Join the European Union and Who Is Going to Pay for It? Cost Estimates for the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia, Complying with the EU Environmental Standards," Working Papers ir00001, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    3. Hartmann, Monika, 2001. "The Dairy Sector in the Central European Candidate (CEC) Countries – The Status of Restructuring and Future Challenges," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(06), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agata Pieniadz & Heinrich Hockmann, 2008. "Factors Driving Quality Standard Compliance in the Polish Dairy Sector," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 36(1), pages 41-52, March.
    2. Ehrich, Malte & Hess, Sebastian, 2015. "The Ability Of Organisations To Adopt Foreign Trade Standards," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209202, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Vőneki, Éva, 2004. "Zur Bewertung des ungarischen SAPARD-Programms unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Investitionen im Milchsektor," IAMO Discussion Papers 59, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Voneki, Eva, 2004. "Zur Bewertung Des Ungarischen Sapard-Programms Unter Besonderer Berucksichtigung Der Investitionen Im Milchsektor," IAMO Discussion Papers 14874, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MANTOVANI Andrea & VANCAUTEREN Mark, 2010. "The Harmonization of Technical Barriers to Trade, Innovation and Export Behavior: Theory with an Application to EU Environmental Regulations," EcoMod2003 330700094, EcoMod.
    2. van Berkum, Siemen, 2009. "Dairy chain competitiveness in EU’s new member states, candidate and potential candidate countries," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(07), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Kedaitiene, Angele & Hockmann, Heinrich, 2002. "Milk and milk processing industry in Lithuania: an analysis of horizontal and vertical integration," IAMO Discussion Papers 44, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Luhmann, Henrike & Schaper, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Acceptance of a Sustainability Standard: Evidence from an Empirical Study of Future-Oriented Dairy Farmers," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244538, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    5. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 2001. "Konsequenzen der Integration im Agrar- und Ernährungssektor zwischen Beitrittsländern und EU-15," IAMO Discussion Papers 35, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    6. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 2001. "Konsequenzen Der Integration Im Agrar- Und Ernährungssektor Zwischen Beitrittslandern Und Eu-15," IAMO Discussion Papers 14888, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    7. Adams, Philip D. & Mai, Yin Hua, 2002. "Three Future Scenarios for Greenhouse-Gas Emissions by Region in Australia," Conference papers 330971, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Salamon, P.B. & Herok, C.A., 2002. "Was bringen mögliche Ergebnisse der WTO-Verhandlungen und der Osterweiterung für den Milchmarkt?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    9. Luhmann, Henrike & Schape, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig & Weiland, Ingke, 2016. "Was Bedingt Die Bereitschaft Deutscher Milcherzeuger Zur Teilnahme An Einem Nachhaltigkeitsstandard? Ergebnisse Einer Empirischen Untersuchung," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244758, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. A. Mantovani & M. Vancauteren, 2003. "The Harmonization of Technical Barriers to Trade, Innovation and Export Behavior: Theory with an application to EU Environmental Data," Working Papers 480, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    11. Roth, T., 2003. "Auswirkungen des EU-Beitritts auf die baltischen Milchmärkte - Ein empirisches Handelsmodell mit Produktdifferenzierung," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 38.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hungary; acquis communautaire; milk hygiene; dairy sector; modernisation; Ungarn; acquis communautaire; Milchhygiene; Milchsektor; Modernisierung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:14881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.