IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esconf/104063.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-level Governance in rural development: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)

Author

Listed:
  • Pollermann, Kim
  • Raue, Petra
  • Schnaut, Gitta

Abstract

In the last funding periods there was steady increase in the number of LEADER-regions in Europe, and, at least in Germany, it is already evident that this gain will continue: for the 2014-2020 funding period there around 300 LAGs expected in comparison to 244 LAGs in the last period. For the new funding period new regulations envisages a Common Strategic Framework (CSF) to provide all EU Funds with a set of basic rules in line with the general principles - partnership, multi-level governance, equality and sustainability. Now there are common options for a so-called “Community-Led Local Development” (CLLD). Although LEADER is commonly called a bottom-up approach, it has to be pointed out that there is a high influence through a superordinated framework of funding regulations. So more precisely LEADER is neither "top-down" nor "bottom-up", but can classified as a “down up”-approach. This clarifies the basic understanding for the terms used in the context of multi-level governance. Second there is a look on the state of the art of LEADER-related research in the view of LEADER as a "down up" approach. Anyhow the experiences with LEADER in the last 25 years can give valuable insights. Altogether, the literature review already supports the need to have a multi-level-view on CLLD.

Suggested Citation

  • Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in rural development: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," EconStor Conference Papers 104063, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:104063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104063/1/ERSA-Multi-Level-Governance.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grieve, John & Lukesch, Robert & Weinspach, Ulrike & Fernandes, Pedro Alfonso & Brakalova, Marina & Cristiano, Simona & Geissendorfer, Manfred & Nemes, Gustav & O'Gready, S. & Sepulveda, Rodrigo Ortiz, 2011. "Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas," 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy 99363, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Birolo, Linda & Secco, Laura & Da Re, Riccardo & Cesaro, Luca, 2012. "Multi-system governance within the EU policy for rural development: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the LEADER program," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126051, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Volk, Alenka & Bojnec, Stefan, 2012. "Local Action Groups and Rural Development Projects: The LEADER Program in Slovenia," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135781, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Oedl-Wieser, Theresia & Strahl, Wibke & Dax, Thomas, 2010. "The LEADER programme 2007-2013: refocusing towards agriculture-oriented activities as a consequence of ‘mainstreaming’ innovative rural action in Austria," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94622, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Judit Katona-Kovacs & Chris High & Gusztav Nemes, 2011. "Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1138, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    7. Mayntz, Renate, 2004. "Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie?," MPIfG Working Paper 04/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Schnaut, Gitta & Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra, 2012. "LEADER - an approach to innovative and suitable solutions in rural areas?," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135779, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Annette Aagaard Thuesen, 2011. "Partnerships as Associations: Input and Output Legitimacy of LEADER Partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 575-594, April.
    10. Birolo, Linda & Secco, Laura & Da Re, Riccardo & Cesaro, Luca, 2012. "Multi-system governance within the EU rural development policy: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the LEADER program," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2012(4), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pollermann, Kim, 2019. "Participation in rural development – the view of non-participants," EconStor Conference Papers 209647, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2016. "Implementation and impacts of the LEADER-approach – reflections on the intervention logic of a participatory approach for rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 148578, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Pollermann, Kim & Fynn, Lynn-Livia, 2021. "Place-based and participative approaches: reflections for policy design in rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 267150, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Pollermann, Kim, 2018. "Participants in participative processes – who they are and what they think about participation," EconStor Conference Papers 190762, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Pappalardo Gioacchino & Sisto Roberta & Pecorino Biagio, 2018. "Is the Partnership Governance Able to Promote Endogenous Rural Development? A Preliminary Assessment Under the Adaptive Co-Management Approach," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 543-565, December.
    6. Pollermann, Kim & Fynn, Lynn-Livia & Schwarze, Stefan, 2021. "What are favouring conditions for the implementation of innovative projects in Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) approaches?," EconStor Conference Papers 228489, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Pollermann & Petra Raue & Gitta Schnaut, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in Rural Development: Analysing Experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1071, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Contributions for the quality of life through a participative approach for rural development – Experiences from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Eastern Germany)," EconStor Conference Papers 88597, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2017. "Input for and output of local governance in rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 173061, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Kola-Bezka Maria, 2020. "Are LAGs contributing to solving social exclusion problems? The case of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodship," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 48(48), pages 35-45, June.
    5. Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Catherine Laidin & Denis Lépicier & Hai Vu Pham & Kim Pollermann & Petra Raue & Gitta Schnaut, 2015. "The Leader process as a European policy for local development: A comparison of the implementation in three European member states," ERSA conference papers ersa15p922, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Thorstensen Erik & Forsberg Ellen-Marie & Underthun Anders & Danihelka Pavel & Řeháček Jakub, 2016. "Regional Development and Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of the Role of Legitimacy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(3), pages 207-226, September.
    7. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-7, June.
    8. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Carmen Valentina RADULESCU, 2019. "Local Development Opportunities In The Context Of Sustainable Development By Applying The Concept Of Smart Village In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1059-1067, November.
    9. Pollermann, Kim, 2018. "Participants in participative processes – who they are and what they think about participation," EconStor Conference Papers 190762, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Pollermann, Kim, 2019. "Participation in rural development – the view of non-participants," EconStor Conference Papers 209647, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Philipp Pattberg & Johannes Stripple, 2008. "Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 367-388, December.
    12. Neumeier Stefan & Pollermann Kim, 2014. "Rural Tourism As Promoter Of Rural Development – Prospects And Limitations: Case Study Findings From A Pilot Projectpromoting Village Tourism," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 6(4), pages 270-296, December.
    13. Gornik, Markus, 2020. "Smart governance: Kashiwa-no-ha smart city in Japan as a model for future urban development?," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 22, number 22.
    14. Katona-Kovacs, Judit, 2014. "Where to put the focus in rural development? Changing the focus from funding to learning," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(1), pages 1-8, April.
    15. Graziella Benedetto & Maria Bonaventura Forleo, 2020. "Foodies? movement fostering stakeholders? networks: A regional case study," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(3), pages 1-31.
    16. Mercedes Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Sanchez & Eugenio Cejudo & Jose Antonio Camacho, 2019. "Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 43-50.
    17. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    18. repec:cha:ysa001:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:39-47 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Franziska Lengerer & Tialda Haartsen & Annett Steinführer, 2023. "Exploring Justice in the Process of Redesigning Local Development Strategies for LEADER: Representation, Distribution, and Recognition," World, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Szabo, G. Gabor & Baranyai, Zsolt & Barta, Istvan, 2014. "Sustainability of Emerging Agricultural Co-operatives in the New Member States of the EU: Hungarian Experience," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 170295, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Antonio COSTA & Fabio DE MATTEIS & Daniela PREITE & Alessandra TAFURO, 2016. "WHAT IMPACT OF LOCAL ACTION GROUPs ON SOCIAL CAPITAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT?," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(9), pages 7-25, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi level Governance; LEADER; CLLD; rural development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis
    • R0 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:104063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.