Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Zurück zum Zehnten: Modelle für die nächste Erbschaftsteuerreform


Author Info

  • Houben, Henriette
  • Maiterth, Ralf
Registered author(s):


    The recent German estate tax reform is criticized with regard to its unconstitutionality and for economical reasons. In particular it is in question whether the extensive tax exemption for firms can be justified by welfare arguments. From an economic point of view it is preferable to establish an estate tax with a broad tax base and low tax rates. The empirical results of our analyses gained by the microsimulation model ERBSIHM show that extremely low tax rates could be obtained. The current progressive tax rate could be halved. Alternative a rather low proportional tax rate of about 10% could be achieved. Such moderate tax rates would certainly increase the acceptance of the estate tax. In addition, such an estate tax reform would meet demands for equability of taxation as well as for low compliance costs and neutral taxation. -- An der Verfassungsmäßigkeit der neuen Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer bestehen ebenso erhebliche Zweifel wie an deren ökonomischer Vernunft. Insbesondere ist fraglich, ob die ins Feld geführten Gemeinwohlgründe tatsächlich die weitgehende bzw. vollständige Steuerfreistellung von Unternehmensvermögen rechtfertigen. Aus ökonomischer Sicht ist eine Erbschaftsteuer mit niedrigen Steuersätzen und einer breiten Bemessungsgrundlage ohne sachliche Steuerbefreiungen vorzuziehen. Die mit Hilfe des Mirkosimulationsmodells ERBSIHM vorgenommene empirische Untersuchung hat gezeigt, dass sowohl im Rahmen eines progressiven Tarifs als auch bei einem Proportionaltarif äußerst moderate Steuersätze implementiert werden könnten. Bei Beibehaltung der progressiven Tarifstruktur ließen sich die Steuersätze halbieren. Alternativ wäre ein einheitlicher Proportionalsteuersatz von nicht einmal 10% möglich. Derart niedrige Steuersätze wären sicherlich förderlich für die Akzeptanz der Erbschaftsteuer. Zudem sprechen Gleichmäßigkeitsüberlegungen, geringere Kosten der Besteuerung und das Postulat der Neutralität der Besteuerung für eine solche Reform.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre in its series arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research with number 69.

    as in new window
    Date of creation: 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:69

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page:

    Related research



    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Morten Bennedsen & Kasper M. Nielsen & Francisco Pérez-González & Daniel Wolfenzon, 2006. "Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance," NBER Working Papers 12356, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Nick Bloom & John Van Reenen, 2006. "Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 733, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Franz W. Wagner, 2006. "Was bedeutet Steuervereinfachung wirklich?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(1), pages 19-33, 02.
    4. Holger Strulik & Volker Grossmann, 2008. "Should Continued Family Firms Face Lower Taxes than other Estates?," CESifo Working Paper Series 2235, CESifo Group Munich.
    5. Morck, Randall & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1988. "Management ownership and market valuation : An empirical analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 293-315, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.