This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 2: A Case of the Preferred Impossible Alternative

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Patricia Mokhtarian (University of California, Davis)
Ilan Salomon (Hebrew University)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

A conceptual model of the choice to telecommute was advanced in an earlier paper (Mokhtarian and Salomon, 1994). In this paper, we present empirical data from a non-representative sample of 628 City of San Diego employees on key variables and relationships in that model. The relationships among possibility, preference, and choice are examined. A key finding is the existence of a large group of people (57% of the sample) for whom telecommuting is a Preferred Impossible Alternative. Dichotomous and continuous constraints are distinguished, and three dichotomous constraints are defined. Lack of awareness is active for 4%, job unsuitability for 44%, and manager disapproval for 51% of the sample. For 68% of the sample, at least one of these constraints is active. Even among those for whom none of the dichotomous constraints is in force, most people do not choose telecommuting due to the presence of active continuous constraints. For only 11% of the entire sample, telecommuting is possible, preferred, and chosen. The potential impacts of self-selection bias are estimated, and sampling bias is qualitatively assessed. This analysis provides a crude but useful estimate of the potential of telecommuting in the population, and more specifically, the relative share of potential telecommuters who are prevented by key dichotomous constraints from choosing that option.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/lab/papers/0505/0505009.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Labor and Demography with number 0505009.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: 12 May 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0505009

Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 28
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: telecommuting; teleworking;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
J - Labor and Demographic Economics

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. P L Mokhtarian & I Salomon, 1994. "Modeling the choice of telecommuting: setting the context," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 26(5), pages 749-766, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Susan Handy & Patricia Mokhtarian, 1996. "The Future of Telecommuting," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series UCD-ITS-REP-96-07, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Patricia Mokhtarian & Michael Bagley, 2000. "Modeling Employees' Perceptions and Proportional Preferences of Work Locations: The Regular Workplace and Telecommuting Alternatives," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series UCD-ITS-REP-00-03, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Walls, Margaret & Safirova, Elena, 2004. "A Review of the Literature on Telecommuting and Its Implications for Vehicle Travel and Emissions," Discussion Papers dp-04-44, Resources For the Future. [Downloadable!]
  3. Rognes, Jon, 2002. "Telecommuting resistance, soft but strong: Development of telecommuting over time, and related rhetoric, in three organisations," Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2002:1, Stockholm School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  4. Ilan Salomon & Patricia Mokhtarian, 1998. "What Happens When Mobility-Inclined Market Segments Face Accessibility-Enhancing Policies?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series UCD-ITS-REP-98-07, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis. [Downloadable!]
  5. Patricia Mokhtarian & Ilan Salomon, 2005. "Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 3: Identifying the Choice Set and Estimating Binary Choice Models for Technology-Based Alternatives," Labor and Demography 0505010, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Krishna Varma & Chaang-Iuan Ho & David Stanek & Patricia Mokhtarian, 1998. "Duration and Frequency of Telecenter Use: Once a Telecommuter, Always a Telecommuter?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series UCD-ITS-REP-98-13, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis. [Downloadable!]
  7. Thomas de Graaff & Piet Rietveld, 2003. "ICT and Substitution between Out-of-home and At-home Work; the Importance of Timing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-061/3, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-6-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.