IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa11p838.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Swedish regional development initiatives in a gender perspective: Policy evaluated against transversal objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Barbro Widerstedt

Abstract

Gender equality has long been a focus in regional development in the European Union. In a Swedish context, the interest has been borne from the fact that rural and sparsely populated areas have a 'women shortage', and that this tendency is accelerating as young women move to cities, while young men stay in the rural areas. Several remedies to this dilemma have been proposed, and one field of analysis stresses the gender-segregated nature of the Swedish labour market and the relative paucity of employment opportunities for women in rural areas. Regional Investment Grants and Regional Development Grants are use to support investment in eligible areas of Sweden, with the objective of bolstering growth, and maintaining a balanced regional development. In addition to the stated main objectives, the investment projects should also address a range of transversal goals - one of which is gender equality and improved employment opportunities for women. Previous studies have noted that there seem to be relatively few regional investment and development grants awarded to female-run firms. This raises the question of whether the rules regulating the grants disproportionally disadvantage female-run firms, and hence is in conflict with the transversal objective of the grant to promote gender equality and provide a more varied labour market. This paper deals with the application and approval of regional investment and regional development grants to female-run firms in Sweden. The main question is whether the rules of eligibility inherently disadvantage female-run firms, and whether there is a difference between male-run firm and female-run firms in the likelihood of applying for the grant. A rule that grants should be awarded in a way that is competitively neutral within a region disadvantages female-led firms, which are more likely to operate on a local market. Given the industry and size of the applying firm, there is no difference in the likelihood that a firm applies for or is awarded a grant between male-led and female-led firms. I also find that these results are somewhat sensitive to the definition of what constitutes a 'female-led' firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbro Widerstedt, 2011. "Swedish regional development initiatives in a gender perspective: Policy evaluated against transversal objectives," ERSA conference papers ersa11p838, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa11p838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa11/e110830aFinal00838.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venables, Anthony J, 1998. "The Assessment: Trade and Location," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 1-6, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Widerstedt, Barbro & Månsson, Jonas & Rosdahl, Jonatan, 2018. "A warm welcome? Access to advisory services for men and women," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 100-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Tsiapa, 2014. "Industrial Concentration Patterns of the European Union," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 5-33.
    2. Emanuel Shachmurove & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2010. "Location, Location, Location: Entrepreneurial Finance Meets Economic Geography," PIER Working Paper Archive 10-030, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Javier Sánchez-Reaza, 2003. "Economic Polarization Through Trade: Trade Liberalization and Regional Growth in Mexico," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-60, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Stoyan Totev, 2010. "Economic Integration and Conversion in the EU Member States," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 3-23.
    5. Megan Claridge & Sarah Box, 2000. "Economic Integration, Sovereignty and Identity: New Zealand in the Global Economy," Treasury Working Paper Series 00/22, New Zealand Treasury.
    6. Simonetta Longhi & Peter Nijkamp & Iulia Traistaru, 2003. "Determinants of Manufacturing Location in EU Accession Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa03p310, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Dunning, John H., 2000. "The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 163-190, April.
    8. Eduardo Levy Yeyati & Christian Daude & Ernesto Stein, 2002. "The FTAA and the Location of FDI," Business School Working Papers diecisiete, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    9. Andrew Coleman, 1999. "Economic Integration and Monetary Union," Treasury Working Paper Series 99/06, New Zealand Treasury.
    10. Giovanna Segre, 2000. "Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in the EU: Are They Complementary or Substitute in Business Cycles Fluctuations?," CERIS Working Paper 200007, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    11. Mauricio Ramírez Grajeda & Ian M. Sheldon, 2015. "Trade Openness and City Interaction," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Amitrajeet A Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), THE REGION AND TRADE New Analytical Directions, chapter 10, pages 267-318, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Eduardo Amaral Haddad & Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli, 2004. "Trade Liberalization And Regional Inequality: Do Transportation Costs Impose A Spatial Poverty Trap?," Anais do XXXII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 32nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 131, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    13. Haddad, Eduardo A. & Domingues, Edson P. & Perobelli, Fernando S., 2002. "Regional effects of economic integration: the case of Brazil," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 453-482, August.
    14. Honkatukia, Juha, 2005. "Emission trade and the electricity markets," Conference papers 331379, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Petersson, Lennart, 2000. "The Theory of New Economic Geography and Industrial Location in SADC," Working Papers 2000:6, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    16. Resmini, Laura, 2003. "Economic integration, industry location and frontier economies in transition countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 205-221, June.
    17. Grazia Ietto-Gillies, 2014. "The Theory of the Transnational Corporation at 50+," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-38, September.
    18. Daniel Shefer, 2011. "The Center-periphery Dilemma and the Issue of Equity in Regional Development," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1192, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Fabrizio Erbetta & Luca Agnello, 2001. "The martingales: theoretical and empirical characteristics," CERIS Working Paper 200107, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    20. Edson Domingues & Eduardo Haddad & Fernando Perobelli, 2001. "Short-run Regional Effects of Alternative Strategies for Economic Integration: The Case of Brazil," ERSA conference papers ersa01p210, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa11p838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.