IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa10p969.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nutrients abatement measures for the EU Water Framework Directive: a regional model for the Beerze and Reusel river basin in the Netherlands (refereed paper)

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Linderhof
  • Stijn Reinhard

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires member states to implement abatement measures to ensure a good ecological and chemical status of all surface and ground waters by 2015. One of the main challenges in the implementation of the WFD is the selection of cost-effective programs of measures to reach these water quality objectives for all water bodies. Assessment of the river basin management plans teaches us that nutrient emission in many water bodies in the Netherlands will not comply with the WFD requirements in 2015. Since agriculture is largely responsible for these nutrient emissions, a number of agricultural technical measures with respect to reduction of nutrient emissions is suggested such as buffer strips, and natural banks, for instance. This paper presents the results of the economic optimization model, called RegiOptimizer, which calculates the lowest economic costs of implementing pollution abatement measures to reach the WFD water quality targets for nutrients at the water body level. The RegiOptimizer model includes two substances namely N and P. One of the key features of the regiOptimizer is that it includes explicitly hydrological relationships to translate nutrient emissions into N and P concentration levels of surface water. In particular, the model takes into account the impact of measures implemented upstream and their impacts on N and P concentrations in surface water downstream. In addition, it takes into account interrelationships between measures for N and P emissions, and it includes tradeoffs between abatement measures for agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. The model is applied to the Beerze and Reusel river basin in the south of the Netherlands which is bordered by Belgium. The first results with a limited number of pollution abatement measures indicate that the total annual costs will amount approximately 1.7 mln Euro for the baseline situation. Alternatively, if Belgium would comply to the WFD targets for nutrients, the total annual costs for pollution abatement measures in the Beerze and Reusel river basin would decline to 1.3 mln Euro. Even though water quality improves for several water bodies many are still too polluted due to the limited number of pollution abatement measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Linderhof & Stijn Reinhard, 2011. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of nutrients abatement measures for the EU Water Framework Directive: a regional model for the Beerze and Reusel river basin in the Netherlands (refereed paper)," ERSA conference papers ersa10p969, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper969.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo Fezzi & Michael Hutchins & Dan Rigby & Ian J. Bateman & Paulette Posen & David Hadley, 2010. "Integrated assessment of water framework directive nitrate reduction measures," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 123-134, March.
    2. Johan Eyckmans & Erika Meynaerts & Sara Ochelen, 2004. "The Environmental Costing Model: a tool for more efficient environmental policymaking in Flanders," Energy, Transport and Environment Working Papers Series ete0405, KU Leuven, Department of Economics - Research Group Energy, Transport and Environment.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kreins, P. & Heidecke, C. & Gömann, H. & Hirt, U. & Wendland, F., 2011. "Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der wissenschaftlichen Politikanalyse zur Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie – Anwendung eines hydro-ökonomischen Modellverbundes für das Weser Einzugsgebiet," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 46, March.
    2. Wustenberghs, H. & Broekx, Steven & Van Hoof, K. & Claeys, Dakerlia & D'Heygere, T. & D'Hooghe, J. & Dessers, R. & Huysmans, T. & Lauwers, Ludwig H. & Meynaerts, E. & Vercaemst, P., 2008. "Cost-benefit analysis of abatement measures for nutrient emission from agriculture," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44245, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kreins, Peter & Heidecke, Claudia & Goemann, Horst & Hirt, Ulrike & Wendland, Frank, 2010. "Möglichkeiten Und Grenzen Der Politikanalyse Zur Umsetzung Der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie -- Anwendung Eines Hydro-Ökonomischen Modellverbundes Für Das Weser Einzugsgebiet," 50th Annual Conference, Braunschweig, Germany, September 29-October 1, 2010 93938, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Carlo Fezzi & Ian Bateman & Tom Askew & Paul Munday & Unai Pascual & Antara Sen & Amii Harwood, 2014. "Valuing Provisioning Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: The Impact of Climate Change on Food Production in the United Kingdom," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(2), pages 197-214, February.
    5. Hao, Zhengzheng & Sturm, Astrid & Wätzold, Frank, 2020. "A novel spatially explicit hydro-economic modelling procedure to design cost-effective agri-environment schemes for mitigating nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural land," MPRA Paper 102860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Petra Kuhr & Josef Haider & Peter Kreins & Ralf Kunkel & Björn Tetzlaff & Harry Vereecken & Frank Wendland, 2013. "Model Based Assessment of Nitrate Pollution of Water Resources on a Federal State Level for the Dimensioning of Agro-environmental Reduction Strategies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(3), pages 885-909, February.
    7. Javier Martínez-Dalmau & Julio Berbel & Rafaela Ordóñez-Fernández, 2021. "Nitrogen Fertilization. A Review of the Risks Associated with the Inefficiency of Its Use and Policy Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Chyzheuskaya, Aksana & O'Donoghue, Cathal & O'Neill, Stephen, 2014. "Using a farm micro-simulation model to evaluate the impact of the nitrogen reduct," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(4), pages 1-11.
    9. Aftab, Ashar & Hanley, Nick & Baiocchi, Giovanni, 2017. "Transferability of Policies to Control Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution in Relatively Similar Catchments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 11-21.
    10. Heidecke, Claudia & Kreins, Peter, 2010. "Agricultural costs for reducing nitrogen surpluses in the Weser river basin," 120th Seminar, September 2-4, 2010, Chania, Crete 109380, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Martin-Ortega, Julia & Perni, Angel & Jackson-Blake, Leah & Balana, Bedru B. & Mckee, Annie & Dunn, Sarah & Helliwell, Rachel & Psaltopoulos, Demetris & Skuras, Dimitris & Cooksley, Susan & Slee, Bill, 2015. "A transdisciplinary approach to the economic analysis of the European Water Framework Directive," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 34-45.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.