Stopping three big inflations (Argentina, Brazil, and Peru)
AbstractMuch existing literature fails to recognize that high inflation (annual rates in three digits) is a distinctly different phenomenon from moderate inflation and hyperinflation. The failure to understand the specific features of the inflation process in the chronic high inflation economies has many times led to a wrong diagnosis of the underlying reasons for changes in inflation in those economies, and the policies needed to stabilize prices in those countries. This lack of understanding extends to the interpretations of the recent hyperinflation in some economies. Argentina, Brazil, and Peru in the 1980s were certainly high-inflation countries. The recent episodes of hyperinflation in these countries were not isolated - instead, they were the culmination of an unstable process, in which inflation crept up gradually for many years before accelerating explosively. These episodes were important because they helpedto dispel the myth that it is possible to maintain a stable high rate of inflation on a long-term basis without harmful effects on growth. The causes of the new hyperinflations were not as clear as in the classical episodes, as they originated from a combination of fiscal and nonfiscal factors. The chronic fiscal imbalances eventually became an insurmountable obstacle, and inflation moved away from the fragile high inflation equilibrium into hyperinflation. The interesting feature of the new episodes (especially in Argentina and Brazil) is that they were not triggered by a large increase in the budget deficit; instead, because the initial equilibrium was so fragile, inflation was in the end destabilized by financial shocks. One important lesson of the new hyperinflations is that the process of restoring price stability has been longer and more costly than in the classical cases. The main reasons for this has been that it was not clear in the minds of the public where inflation would settle once hyperinflation was stopped. In the classic hyperinflations of Europe in the 1920s, expectations were that inflation would return to the low levels that had prevailed before. In the new episodes, there is no compelling reason for agents to expect that the economy would go back to low inflation. Experience showed that inflationary expectations initially settled near the level where inflation was prior to hyperinflation. As a result, the disinflation process must continue once hyperinflation is stopped.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 999.
Date of creation: 31 Oct 1992
Date of revision:
Economic Theory&Research; Inflation; Environmental Economics&Policies; Public Sector Economics&Finance; Development Economics&Aid Effectiveness;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Tornell, Aaron & Velasco, Andres, 1995.
"Money-Based Versus Exchange Rate-Based Stabilization with Endogenous Fiscal Policy,"
95-21, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
- Aaron Tornell & Andres Velasco, 1995. "Money-Based versus Exchange Rate-Based Stabilization with Endogenous Fiscal Policy," NBER Working Papers 5300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Aaron Tornell & Andrés Velasco, 1994. "Fiscal Discipline and the Choice of Exchange Rate Regime," Research Department Publications 4004, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
- Bruno, Michael & Easterly, William, 1998.
"Inflation crises and long-run growth,"
Journal of Monetary Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 3-26, February.
- Bittencourt, Manoel, 2008.
"Inflation and Financial Development: Evidence from Brazil,"
Working Paper Series
RP2008/14, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
- Bittencourt, Manoel, 2011. "Inflation and financial development: Evidence from Brazil," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 91-99.
- Bittencourt, Manoel, 2011. "Inflation and financial development: Evidence from Brazil," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 91-99, January.
- Manoel Bittencourt, 2007. "Inflation and Financial Development: Evidence from Brazil," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 165, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
- Bittencourt, Manoel, 2007. "Inflation and Financial Development: Evidence from Brazil," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, GÃ¶ttingen 2007 1, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
- Manoel Bittencourt, 2008. "Inflation and Financial Development: Evidence from Brazil," Working Papers 67, Economic Research Southern Africa.
- Tornell, Aaron & Velasco, Andres, 1995. "Fiscal discipline and the choice of exchange rate regime," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 759-770, April.
- Tornell, Aaron & Velasco, Andres, 1998. "Fiscal discipline and the choice of a nominal anchor in stabilization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-30, October.
- Aaron Tornell & Andrés Velasco, 1994. "La disciplina fiscal y la elección de régimen cambiario," Research Department Publications 4005, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.