IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwcsr/18955.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of the Securities Market Amendment Act 2002 on Insider Trading in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert, Aaron
  • Tourani-Rad, Alireza
  • Wisniewski, Tomasz Piotr

Abstract

Insider trading has a number of harmful effects that can result in financial market distortions reducing its efficient functioning. Much of this harm comes from the large profits insiders expropriate from small investors and the resulting loss of confidence in the market by the investing community. This causes investors to reduce investment and participation in the market and imposes higher risk premiums and transaction costs on share prices to compensate for the added risk of trading against an insider. Studies have however shown that the regulatory regime of a country can impact on the degree of harm suffered by a market from the presence of insiders.However perceptions and commentaries on the laws governing insider trading in New Zealand over the past decade and a half have been generally dismissive. These views in no small part have been driven by the lack of successful enforcement since their introduction in 1988 despite a number of high profile situations that have reinforced the belief that insider trading is rife in the market. Etebari Tourani-Rad and Gilbert (2004) also showed that under the previous regime insider's trades earned profits that were significantly higher than both those of ordinary investors as well as insiders from more effectively regulated markets. To rectify this problem the Securities Market Amendment Act 2002 was enacted targeting the major weaknesses of the previous law. The new law now requires all corporate insiders executives directors and substantial shareholders to disclose details of their transactions within 5 working days and allows the Securities Commissions to prosecute an insider. These changes should reduce the amount of insider trading and therefore improve confidence in the New Zealand Stock Exchange. This paper examines the effect that these changes have had on the structure of the New Zealand market to see if the changes have been effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert, Aaron & Tourani-Rad, Alireza & Wisniewski, Tomasz Piotr, 2005. "The Impact of the Securities Market Amendment Act 2002 on Insider Trading in New Zealand," Working Paper Series 18955, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:18955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/18955
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Utpal Bhattacharya & Hazem Daouk, 2002. "The World Price of Insider Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 75-108, February.
    2. Etebari, Ahmad & Tourani-Rad, Alireza & Gilbert, Aaron, 2004. "Disclosure regulation and the profitability of insider trading: Evidence from New Zealand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 479-502, November.
    3. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18955 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chang, Millicent & Watson, Iain, 2015. "Delayed disclosure of insider trades: Incentives for and indicators of future performance?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PA), pages 182-197.
    3. Gilbert, Aaron & Tourani-Rad, Alireza & Wisniewski, Tomasz Piotr, 2005. "The Impact of the Securities Market Amendment Act 2002 on Insider Trading in New Zealand," Working Paper Series 3860, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    4. Aaron Gilbert & Alireza Tourani-Rad & Tomasz Piotr Wisniewski, 2007. "Insiders and the law: The impact of regulatory change on insider trading," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 745-766, September.
    5. Xianfeng Jiang & Yongdong Shi, 2006. "The Impact of Insider Trading on the Secondary Market with Order-Driven System," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 7(1), pages 129-143, May.
    6. Arturo Bris, 2005. "Do Insider Trading Laws Work?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 11(3), pages 267-312, June.
    7. Jonathan A. Batten & Igor Lončarski & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2018. "When Kamay Met Hill: Organisational Ethics in Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 779-792, February.
    8. Aghanya, Daniel & Agarwal, Vineet & Poshakwale, Sunil, 2020. "Market in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), stock price informativeness and liquidity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Michael Firth & T. Y. Leung & Oliver M. Rui, 2011. "Insider Trading in Hong Kong: Tests of Stock Returns and Trading Frequency," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 505-533.
    10. Stulze, Rene M., 2008. "Securities Laws, Disclosure, and National Capital Markets in the Age of Financial Globalization," Working Paper Series 2008-13, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
    11. Ojah, Kalu & Muhanji, Stella & Kodongo, Odongo, 2020. "Insider trading laws and price informativeness in emerging stock markets: The South African case," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    12. James J. Angel & Douglas M. McCabe, 2018. "Insider Trading 2.0? The Ethics of Information Sales," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 747-760, February.
    13. Jan Hanousek & Hoje Jo & Christos Pantzalis & Jung Chul Park, 2023. "A Dilemma of Self-interest vs. Ethical Responsibilities in Political Insider Trading," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 137-167, September.
    14. Hans Degryse & Frank Jong & Jérémie Lefebvre, 2014. "An Empirical Analysis of Legal Insider Trading in The Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 71-103, March.
    15. de la Torre, Augusto & Gozzi, Juan Carlos & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2007. "Stock market development under globalization: Whither the gains from reforms?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1731-1754, June.
    16. Wisniewski, Tomasz P., 2004. "Reexamination of the link between insider trading and price efficiency," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 209-228, June.
    17. Agrawal, Anup & Nasser, Tareque, 2012. "Insider trading in takeover targets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 598-625.
    18. Hans Degryse & Frank Jong & Jérémie Lefebvre, 2016. "Legal Insider Trading and Stock Market Liquidity," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 83-104, March.
    19. Gregoire, Philippe & Huang, Hui, 2008. "Informed trading, noise trading and the cost of equity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 13-32.
    20. Franzen, Laurel & Li, Xu & Vargus, Mark E., 2013. "The effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on the timely disclosure of restricted stock trading," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 47-52.
    21. Chauhan, Yogesh & Kumar, K. Kiran & Chaturvedula, Chakrapani, 2016. "Information asymmetry and the information content of insider trades: Evidence from the Indian stock market," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 65-79.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:18955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.