IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2001-13a.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental uncertainty, corporate strategy, performance measurement and the creation of economic value

Author

Listed:
  • Groot, L.C.M.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

Abstract

Evidence from practice indicates that firms frequently alter their performance measurement systems in order to accommodate effectively to dynamic circumstances and to changing corporate strategies. One common element in this development is an increasing uncertainty on the part of corporate managers about the usefulness of accounting information for performance evaluation. The idea is spreading that performance evaluation systems, in order to become effective, should include not only accounting information, but also non-financial and qualitative information as well. Publications on the 'Performance Pyramid' (McNair, Lynch & Cross, 1990) and on the 'Balanced Scorecard' (Kaplan & Norton, 1993) do indicate that changes are being made in this respect. Despite much debate on the issue of performance measures, almost no empirical evidence exists about the effectiveness of accounting, non-accounting and qualitative information for management control purposes. This paper presents an empirical study among 54 publicly listed companies in The Netherlands. In this study we made an attempt to classify different performance measurement systems as they are being used by corporate controllers to measure the performance of their most important production units’ managers. The classification is based on the degree to which the actual performance measurement system is based on (accounting) measures of output, on quantitative measures or on measures of qualitative aspects of the business unit manager’s performance. Tests indicate that the classification makes a valid and meaningful distinction between the different classes of performance measurement systems. Based on this classification, a study has been conducted to assess the relationship between the use of certain performance

Suggested Citation

  • Groot, L.C.M., 2001. "Environmental uncertainty, corporate strategy, performance measurement and the creation of economic value," Serie Research Memoranda 013a, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2001-13a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/2001013a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1985. "Organizational controls and discretionary program decision making: A field study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 67-85, January.
    2. Ittner, CD & Larcker, DF, 1998. "Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36, pages 1-35.
    3. Govindarajan, V. & Gupta, Anil K., 1985. "Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-66, January.
    4. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 462-463, October.
    5. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Narayanan, V. K., 1984. "Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 33-47, January.
    6. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 465-467, October.
    7. Demirag, Istemi & Tylecote, Andrew, 1996. "Short-term performance pressures on British and Scandinavian firms: Case studies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 201-206, April.
    8. Hopwood, Ag, 1972. "Empirical Study Of Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10, pages 156-182.
    9. Eugene W. Anderson & Claes Fornell & Roland T. Rust, 1997. "Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 129-145.
    10. Otley, Dt, 1978. "Budget Use And Managerial Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 122-149.
    11. Bushman, RM & Indjejikian, RJ & Smith, A, 1995. "Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: The role of intrafirm interdependencies," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33, pages 101-128.
    12. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 467-468, October.
    13. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 463-465, October.
    14. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 460-461, October.
    15. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1990. "The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management Myopia," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 297-313.
    16. Ittner, CD & Larcker, DF, 1995. "Total quality management and the choice of information and reward systems," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33, pages 1-34.
    17. Mia, Lokman & Chenhall, Robert H., 1994. "The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Unknown, 1997. "Book Review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 459-460, October.
    19. Unknown, 1997. "Book Reviews," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 12, pages 1-3.
    20. Hopwood, Ag, 1972. "Empirical Study Of Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation - Reply," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10, pages 189-193.
    21. Merchant, Kenneth A. & Rockness, Joanne, 1994. "The ethics of managing earnings: An empirical investigation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 79-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    2. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    3. José G. VARGAS-HERNANDEZ, 2014. "Reflections on the Impact of the New Economic, Sociological and Historical Institutionalism in Institutional Social Policy," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 202-215, December.
    4. Zeelenberg, Marcel & van Dijk, Wilco W. & Manstead, Antony S. R., 2000. "Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 143-154, January.
    5. John Finch, 2000. "Is post-Marshallian economics an evolutionary research tradition?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 377-406.
    6. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    7. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    8. Löning, Hélène & Besson, M. & Mendoza, Carla, 2008. "Dual use of budgeting in uncertainty contexts: Explorative study of senior sales and marketing managers," HEC Research Papers Series 897, HEC Paris.
    9. Chenhall, Robert H. & Moers, Frank, 2015. "The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    11. R. Murray Lindsay, 1994. "Publication System Biases Associated with the Statistical Testing Paradigm," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 33-57, June.
    12. Chapman, Christopher S., 1997. "Reflections on a contingent view of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, February.
    13. Klaus Derfuss, 2015. "Relating Context Variables to Participative Budgeting and Evaluative Use of Performance Measures: A Meta-analysis," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 238-278, June.
    14. Abdel-Maksoud, A. & Cerbioni, F. & Ricceri, F. & Velayutham, S., 2010. "Employee morale, non-financial performance measures, deployment of innovative managerial practices and shop-floor involvement in Italian manufacturing firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 36-55.
    15. Dunk, Alan S., 2003. "Moderated regression, constructs and measurement in management accounting: a reflection," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 793-802.
    16. Van Veen-Dirks, P.M.G., 1998. "Implications of the New Manufacturing Environment for Management Control System Design," Research Memorandum 759, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Reheul, Anne-Mie & Jorissen, Ann, 2010. "Do CEOs Shape Planning, Control and Performance Evaluation Systems in SMEs?," Working Papers 2010/26, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    18. Ho, Joanna L.Y. & Wu, Anne & Wu, Steve Y.C., 2014. "Performance measures, consensus on strategy implementation, and performance: Evidence from the operational-level of organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 38-58.
    19. Irène Georgescu, 2012. "Communication de l'information et pressions financière interne: une étude exploratoire dans une organisation professionnelle," Post-Print hal-00690953, HAL.
    20. Jean‐François Henri & Steeve Massicotte & Dominique Arbour, 2020. "Exploring the Consequences of Competing Uses of Budgets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 257-268, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2001-13a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.