IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vas/papers/28.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zakat and Inequality: Some Evidence from Pakistan

Author

Abstract

This paper presents empirical evidence on the extent to which zakat---a form of religiously-mandated charity under Islam---achieves its intended objective in Pakistan. Detailed income and expenditure data from Pakistan's Household Income and Expenditure Survey for 1987-88 are used to construct two income distributions---one containing the distribution of income which would have obtained if relevant forms of charity were not given, and one containing the distribution of income which obtains under a regime in which such charitable giving takes place. Atkinson-Kolm-Sen (AKS) ethical relative indices of income inequality are computed for Pakistan and each of its four provinces, for each of these two income distributions, and are compared over a range of parameter values. Evidence is found that zakat does redistribute from the better off to the worse-off, and so achieves some reduction in measured income inequality in Pakistan. Both intra-province and inter-province components of over-all inequality decline, though the amount of change is generally small. These conclusions are shown to be robust to a wide range of normative values the investigator may bring elect.

Suggested Citation

  • Jehle, Geoffrey A., 1993. "Zakat and Inequality: Some Evidence from Pakistan," Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series 28, Vassar College Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:vas:papers:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnston, David W. & Menon, Nidhiya, 2022. "Income and views on minimum living standards," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 18-34.
    2. Fatima Lambarraa & Gerhard Riener, 2012. "On the Norms of Charitable Giving in Islam: A Field Experiment," Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 111, Courant Research Centre PEG.
    3. Lambarraa, Fatima & Riener, Gerhard, 2015. "On the norms of charitable giving in Islam: Two field experiments in Morocco," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 69-84.
    4. Mejda Bouanani & Besma Belhadj, 2019. "Zakat and Poverty Alleviation in Tunisia Using the Fuzzy Approach," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 421-432, June.
    5. World Bank, 2002. "Poverty Assessment : Poverty in Pakistan - Vulnerabilities, Social Caps, and Rural Dynamics," World Bank Publications - Reports 15335, The World Bank Group.
    6. Amjad Naveed & Cong Wang, 2018. "Can religion explain cross-country differences in inequality? A global perspective," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(3), pages 481-518, March.
    7. Mejda Bouanani & Besma Belhadj, 2020. "Does Zakat reduce poverty? Evidence from Tunisia using the Fuzzy Approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 835-850, November.
    8. Rasool, Mohamed & Harun, Mohd & Salleh, Ariffin & Idris, Nor, 2011. "Poverty Measurement in Malaysian Zakat Institutions: A Theoretical Survey," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 45, pages 123-129.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15015 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:idn:jimfjn:v:1:y:2016:i:2a:p:1-20 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vas:papers:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sean Flynn (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edvasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.