Budget Support: A Reformed Approach Or Old Wine In New Skins?
AbstractMulti-donor budget support is an increasingly important modality for aid delivery, comprising up to30 per cent of central government spending in sub-Saharan African countries. While many donor institutions regard budget support as an improved method of developmental assistance, citing positive impacts on pro-poor spending and the quality of services delivered to the poor, the concepts of strengthened ownership and sovereignty at the heart of this new approach have not been fully implemented to date. This paper explores deficiencies evident in three areas: (i) the volatility of budget support funding remains high, undercutting national-budget sustainability; (ii) the non-BWI donor community is overly reliant on conditionality formulated by the World Bank and IMF, conditionality that is ideologically coloured and often inconsistent with PRSPs; and (iii) the process towards harmonization and alignment is slow and sluggish, complicated by donor concerns over visibility and influence as well as deficiencies in recipient financial management systems, a lack of transparency, and weak links between national budgets and poverty-reduction strategies. It is hoped that additional research in this area will facilitate the development of budget support schemes with greater harmonization and alignment, enhanced recipient ownership, and larger effects on poverty reduction.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in its series UNCTAD Discussion Papers with number 190.
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Palais des Nations, CH - 1211 Geneva 10
Phone: +41 22 907 12 34
Fax: +41 22 907 00 43
Web page: http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2101&lang=1
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Dani Rodrik, 2006. "Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank's Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 973-987, December.
- Stefan G. Koeberle, 2003. "Should Policy-Based Lending Still Involve Conditionality?," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 18(2), pages 249-273.
- Benedict J. Clements & Gabriela Inchauste & Nita Thacker & Thomas William Dorsey & Shamsuddin Tareq & Emanuele Baldacci & Sanjeev Gupta & Mark W. Plant, 2002. "Is the PRGF Living Up to Expectations?," IMF Occasional Papers 216, International Monetary Fund.
- Knoll, Martin, 2011. "Foreign aid and revenue response: An examination of joint General Budget Support," Discussion Papers 2011/23, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rachid Bouhia).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.