IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ubc/clssrn/clsrn_admin-2014-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UPSKILL: A Credible Test of Workplace Literacy and Essential Skills Training

Author

Listed:
  • Dowie, Michael
  • Gyarmati, David
  • Hébert, Sophie
  • Leckie, Norm
  • Palameta, Boris
  • Taylor, Shek-wai Hui

Abstract

The last decade has seen an increasing volume of research that reveals significant gaps in literacy and Essential Skills (LES) among the Canadian workforce. In addition to having negative impacts on firms’ productivity, research also suggests that workers suffer consequences of low literacy in the form of lower wages, reduced job stability, and even higher health risks from workplace injury. While much anecdotal evidence suggests that LES training may be helpful in eliminating these skills gaps, its use in the workplace remains low relative to the size of the apparent need. Part of the reason for low firm investments is the lack of a credible business case providing clear evidence of its return on investment. The Office of Literacy and Essential Skills (OLES), a branch of Employment and Social Development Canada, aimed to fill this gap by evaluating workplace LES training with the most rigorous evaluation methods. In partnership with the Social Research and Demonstration Corporation (SRDC), the UPSKILL project was launched in 2010. A Pan-Canadian research and demonstration project, UPSKILL utilized a random assignment design to provide the most reliable measures of the impacts of LES training in the workplace. Over 100 firms and nearly 1,500 workers in the Accommodations sector were enrolled across the country in eight provinces. The findings indicate that workplace LES training does, indeed, have large positive impacts on workers’ skills, job performance, and a range of economic and social outcomes for workers and firms. A benefit-cost analysis also reveals a fairly significant positive return on investment. Importantly, the study also finds that the pattern of impacts vary significantly across firms in ways that have important implications for the design and delivery of effective training programs. Understanding these factors can lead to policies that support both larger employer investments in workplace training and higher return on investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dowie, Michael & Gyarmati, David & Hébert, Sophie & Leckie, Norm & Palameta, Boris & Taylor, Shek-wai Hui, 2014. "UPSKILL: A Credible Test of Workplace Literacy and Essential Skills Training," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2014-46, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 24 Oct 2014.
  • Handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/workingpapers/CLSRN%20Working%20Paper%20no.%20143%20-%20Gyarmati%20et%20al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John F. Helliwell & David Gyarmati & Craig Joyce & Heather Orpana, 2020. "Building an Epidemiology of Happiness," NBER Working Papers 28095, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    literacy; low-skilled; formal training programs; on-the-job training; productivity; rate of return; service sector; occupational safety; job satisfact;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vivian Tran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.