IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/126672.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Iterates of the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm May Not Converge

Author

Listed:
  • Bolte, Jérôme
  • Combettes, Cyrille
  • Pauwels, Edouard

Abstract

The Frank-Wolfe algorithm is a popular method for minimizing a smooth convex function f over a compact convex set C. While many convergence results have been derived in terms of function values, hardly nothing is known about the convergence behavior of the sequence of iterates (xt)t2N. Under the usual assumptions, we design several counterexamples to the convergence of (xt)t2N, where f is d-time continuously differentiable, d > 2, and f(xt) ---> minC f. Our counterexamples cover the cases of open-loop, closed-loop, and line-search step-size strategies. We do not assume misspecification of the linear minimization oracle and our results thus hold regardless of the points it returns, demonstrating the fundamental pathologies in the convergence behavior of (xt)t2N.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolte, Jérôme & Combettes, Cyrille & Pauwels, Edouard, 2022. "The Iterates of the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm May Not Converge," TSE Working Papers 22-1311, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:126672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2022/wp_tse_1311.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    2. Patrick L. Combettes & Jean-Christophe Pesquet, 2011. "Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Heinz H. Bauschke & Regina S. Burachik & Patrick L. Combettes & Veit Elser & D. Russell Luke & Henry (ed.), Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, chapter 0, pages 185-212, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    2. Sarah Perrin & Thierry Roncalli, 2019. "Machine Learning Optimization Algorithms & Portfolio Allocation," Papers 1909.10233, arXiv.org.
    3. Ernest K. Ryu & Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for pathological convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 747-778, December.
    4. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    5. Junhong Lin & Lorenzo Rosasco & Silvia Villa & Ding-Xuan Zhou, 2018. "Modified Fejér sequences and applications," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 95-113, September.
    6. Silvia Bonettini & Peter Ochs & Marco Prato & Simone Rebegoldi, 2023. "An abstract convergence framework with application to inertial inexact forward–backward methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 319-362, March.
    7. Puya Latafat & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2017. "Asymmetric forward–backward–adjoint splitting for solving monotone inclusions involving three operators," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 57-93, September.
    8. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Sedi Bartz & Rubén Campoy & Hung M. Phan, 2022. "An Adaptive Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 1019-1055, December.
    10. Francesco Rinaldi & Damiano Zeffiro, 2023. "Avoiding bad steps in Frank-Wolfe variants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 225-264, January.
    11. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    12. Tiến-Sơn Phạm, 2019. "Optimality Conditions for Minimizers at Infinity in Polynomial Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 1381-1395, November.
    13. Filippozzi, Rafaela & Gonçalves, Douglas S. & Santos, Luiz-Rafael, 2023. "First-order methods for the convex hull membership problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 17-33.
    14. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Friesz, Terry L. & Tourreilles, Francisco A. & Han, Anthony Fu-Wha, 1979. "Multi-Criteria Optimization Methods in Transport Project Evaluation: The Case of Rural Roads in Developing Countries," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1970s 318817, Transportation Research Forum.
    16. Hedy Attouch & Alexandre Cabot & Zaki Chbani & Hassan Riahi, 2018. "Inertial Forward–Backward Algorithms with Perturbations: Application to Tikhonov Regularization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 1-36, October.
    17. Damian Clarke & Daniel Paila~nir & Susan Athey & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Synthetic Difference In Differences Estimation," Papers 2301.11859, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    18. Fabiana R. Oliveira & Orizon P. Ferreira & Gilson N. Silva, 2019. "Newton’s method with feasible inexact projections for solving constrained generalized equations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 159-177, January.
    19. Ali Fattahi & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2019. "Mass Customization and “Forecasting Options’ Penetration Rates Problem”," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1120-1134, July.
    20. Pokojovy, Michael & Jobe, J. Marcus, 2022. "A robust deterministic affine-equivariant algorithm for multivariate location and scatter," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:126672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.