Accounting for China's Growth
AbstractChina has achieved impressive growth over the last three decades. However, there has been debate over the sources of the growth, and the role of the intensive versus extensive margin. Growth accounting exercises at the aggregate level (Rawski and Perkins, 2008; Bosworth and Collins, 2008) suggest an equal role for both. But for the non-agricultural sector, there have been doubts about the contribution of TFP improvements to growth. For the period between 1978 and 1998, Young (2003) stresses the role of labor deepening, including the reallocation from agriculture, while more recent analysis point to the role of rising rates of investment. Because labor reallocations across sectors, TFP growth at the sector level and investment are all inter-related, simple growth decompositions that are often used in the literature are not appropriate for quantifying their contributions to growth. In this paper, we develop a three sector model to quantify the sources of China's growth. The sectors include agriculture, and within non-agriculture, the state and non-state components. We find only a modest role for labor reallocation and capital deepening, and identify rising TFP in the non-state nonagricultural sector as the key driver of growth. We also find significant misallocation of capital: The much less efficient state sector continues to absorb more than half of all fixed investment. If capital had been allocated efficiently, China could have achieved the same growth performance without any increase in the rate of aggregate investment. This has important implications for China as it tries to rebalance its growth. Finally, in light of important concerns over data, we examine the robustness of our key results to alternative data
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number tecipa-394.
Length: 59 pages
Date of creation: 16 Feb 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario
Phone: (416) 978-5283
China; Growth; TFP; Investment; intensive vs extensive margins;
Other versions of this item:
- E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment
- O4 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-02-27 (All new papers)
- NEP-CNA-2010-02-27 (China)
- NEP-DEV-2010-02-27 (Development)
- NEP-EFF-2010-02-27 (Efficiency & Productivity)
- NEP-FDG-2010-02-27 (Financial Development & Growth)
- NEP-MAC-2010-02-27 (Macroeconomics)
- NEP-TRA-2010-02-27 (Transition Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Holz, Carsten A., 2011. "The unbalanced growth hypothesis and the role of the state: The case of China's state-owned enterprises," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 220-238, November.
- Jiang, Yanqing, 2011. "Understanding openness and productivity growth in China: An empirical study of the Chinese provinces," China Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 290-298, September.
- Lei, Chaochao & Zhang, Rengui & Wu, Baocheng, 2013. "Labor reallocation in China: 1978–2011," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 668-673.
- Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2010.
"Why Have Economic Reforms in Mexico Not Generated Growth?,"
NBER Working Papers
16580, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2010. "Why Have Economic Reforms in Mexico Not Generated Growth?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1005-27, December.
- Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2010. "Why have economic reforms in Mexico not generated growth?," Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 453, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Amit K. Khandelwal & Peter K. Schott & Shang-Jin Wei, 2011.
"Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters,"
NBER Working Papers
17524, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Amit K. Khandelwal & Peter K. Schott & Shang-Jin Wei, 2013. "Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2169-95, October.
- Khandelwal, Amit & Schott, Peter K. & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2012. "Trade liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 9246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Trevor Tombe, 2010. "The Missing Food Problem: How Low Agricultural Imports Contribute to International Income and Productivity Differences," Working Papers, University of Toronto, Department of Economics tecipa-416, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Loren Brandt & Johannes Van Biesebroeck & Yifan Zhang, 2009.
"Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing,"
NBER Working Papers
15152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Brandt, Loren & Van Biesebroeck, Johannes & Zhang, Yifan, 2012. "Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 339-351.
- Giovanni Dosi & Jiasu Lei & Xiaodan Yu, 2013. "Institutional Change and Productivity Growth in China's Manufacturing 1998-2007: the Microeconomics of Creative Restructuring," LEM Papers Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy 2013/07, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
- Liu, Jing & Cao, Shutao, 2011. "Productivity Growth and Ownership Change in China: 1998-2007," MPRA Paper 30571, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Yikai Wang, 2014. "Will China Escape the Middle-income Trap? A Politico-economic Theory of Growth and State Capitalism," 2014 Meeting Papers, Society for Economic Dynamics 202, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Cao, Kang Hua & Birchenall, Javier A., 2013. "Agricultural productivity, structural change, and economic growth in post-reform China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 165-180.
- Ding Lu, 2011. "Transition of China’s growth pattern," Frontiers of Economics in China, Springer, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 535-555, December.
- Lee, Soohyung & Malin, Benjamin A., 2013. "Education's role in China's structural transformation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 148-166.
- John Whalley & Chunbing Xing, 2012. "The Sustainability of Chinese Growth and the Aggregate Factor Substitution Elasticity," CESifo Working Paper Series 3736, CESifo Group Munich.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePEc Maintainer).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.