IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/snv/dp2009/2014110.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Placing Limitations on the Size of Personal Networks Changes the Structural Properties of Complex Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi

    (College of Engineering, Seoul National University)

  • Jorn Altmann

    (College of Engineering, Seoul National University)

Abstract

People-to-people interactions in the real world and in virtual environments (e.g., Facebook) can be represented through complex networks. Changes of the structural properties of these complex networks are caused through a variety of dynamic processes. While accepting the fact that variability in individual patterns of behavior (i.e., establishment of random or FOAF-type potential links) in social environments might lead to an increase or decrease in the structural properties of a complex network, in this paper, we focus on another factor that may contribute to such changes, namely the size of personal networks. Any personal network comes with the cost of maintaining individual connections. Despite the fact that technology has shrunk our world, there is also a limit to how many close friends one can keep and count on. It is a relatively small number. In this paper, we develop a multi-agent based model to capture, compare, and explain the structural changes within a growing social network (e.g., expanding the social relations beyond one's social circles). We aim to show that, in addition to various dynamic processes of human interactions, limitations on the size of personal networks can also lead to changes in the structural properties of networks (i.e., the average shortest-path length). Our simulation result shows that the famous small world theory of interconnectivity holds true or even can be shrunk, if people manage to utilize all their existing connections to reach other parties. In addition to this, it can clearly be observed that the network¡¯s average path length has a significantly smaller value, if the size of personal networks is set to larger values in our network growth model. Therefore, limitations on the size of personal networks in network growth models lead to an increase in the network¡¯s average path length.

Suggested Citation

  • Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2014. "How Placing Limitations on the Size of Personal Networks Changes the Structural Properties of Complex Networks," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014110, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Jan 2014.
  • Handle: RePEc:snv:dp2009:2014110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://temep-repec.my-groups.de/DP-110.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barabási, Albert-László & Albert, Réka & Jeong, Hawoong, 1999. "Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 173-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jörn Altmann, 2015. "A Network Formation Model for Social Object Networks," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Zuojun Max Shen & Juliang Zhang & Runtong Zhang (ed.), Liss 2014, edition 127, pages 615-625, Springer.
    2. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2014. "How Variability in Individual Patterns of Behavior Changes the Structural Properties of Networks," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014114, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Jun 2014.
    3. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2016. "How Network Visibility and Strategic Networking Leads to the Emergence of Certain Network Characteristics: A Complex Adaptive System Approach," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2016130, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2016.
    4. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2016. "How Strategic Networking Impacts the Networking Outcome: A Complex Adaptive System Approach," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2016131, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2016.
    5. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2014. "How Structural Changes in Complex Networks Impact Organizational Learning Performance," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014111, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Mar 2014.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Wei & Shi, Yuming & Huang, Qiuling, 2014. "Modeling the Chinese language as an evolving network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 268-276.
    2. Yan Qiang & Bo Pei & Weili Wu & Juanjuan Zhao & Xiaolong Zhang & Yue Li & Lidong Wu, 2014. "Improvement of path analysis algorithm in social networks based on HBase," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 588-599, October.
    3. Pi, Xiaochen & Tang, Longkun & Chen, Xiangzhong, 2021. "A directed weighted scale-free network model with an adaptive evolution mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    4. Stephanie Rend'on de la Torre & Jaan Kalda & Robert Kitt & Juri Engelbrecht, 2016. "On the topologic structure of economic complex networks: Empirical evidence from large scale payment network of Estonia," Papers 1602.04352, arXiv.org.
    5. Yoshiharu Maeno & Kenji Nishiguchi & Satoshi Morinaga & Hirokazu Matsushima, 2014. "Impact of credit default swaps on financial contagion," Papers 1411.1356, arXiv.org.
    6. Rabbani, Fereshteh & Khraisha, Tamer & Abbasi, Fatemeh & Jafari, Gholam Reza, 2021. "Memory effects on link formation in temporal networks: A fractional calculus approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 564(C).
    7. Gabrielle Demange, 2012. "On the influence of a ranking system," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 431-455, July.
    8. Cheng, Ranran & Peng, Mingshu & Yu, Weibin, 2014. "Pinning synchronization of delayed complex dynamical networks with nonlinear coupling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 426-431.
    9. Tsao, J.Y. & Boyack, K.W. & Coltrin, M.E. & Turnley, J.G. & Gauster, W.B., 2008. "Galileo's stream: A framework for understanding knowledge production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 330-352, March.
    10. Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2011. "Knowledge, Complexity and Networks," Chapters, in: Cristiano Antonelli (ed.), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Duan, Shuyu & Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "A new information dimension of complex network based on Rényi entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 529-542.
    12. Sanjeev Goyal & Marco J. van der Leij & José Luis Moraga-Gonzalez, 2006. "Economics: An Emerging Small World," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(2), pages 403-432, April.
    13. Silva, F.N. & Viana, M.P. & Travençolo, B.A.N. & Costa, L. da F., 2011. "Investigating relationships within and between category networks in Wikipedia," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 431-438.
    14. Dávid Csercsik & Sándor Imre, 2017. "Cooperation and coalitional stability in decentralized wireless networks," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 571-584, April.
    15. Chung-Yuan Huang & Chuen-Tsai Sun & Hsun-Cheng Lin, 2005. "Influence of Local Information on Social Simulations in Small-World Network Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8.
    16. Sun, Bingbin & Yao, Jialing & Xi, Lifeng, 2019. "Eigentime identities of fractal sailboat networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 338-349.
    17. Waseem Akram & Muaz Niazi & Laszlo Barna Iantovics & Athanasios V. Vasilakos, 2019. "Towards Agent-Based Model Specification of Smart Grid: A Cognitive Agent-Based Computing Approach," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(3-B), pages 546-585.
    18. Luka Kronegger & Anuška Ferligoj & Patrick Doreian, 2011. "On the dynamics of national scientific systems," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 989-1015, August.
    19. Yang, Xu-Hua & Lou, Shun-Li & Chen, Guang & Chen, Sheng-Yong & Huang, Wei, 2013. "Scale-free networks via attaching to random neighbors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3531-3536.
    20. Legara, Erika Fille & Monterola, Christopher & Juanico, Dranreb Earl & Litong-Palima, Marisciel & Saloma, Caesar, 2008. "Earning potential in multilevel marketing enterprises," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(19), pages 4889-4895.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Small-World Network; Complex Networks; Average Shortest Path Length; Size of Personal Networks; Network Growth Model.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snv:dp2009:2014110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jorn Altmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tesnukr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.