IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/siu/wpaper/17-2004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Semi-parametric Two-component “Compound” Mixture Model and Its Application to Estimating Malaria Attributable Fractions

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Qin

    (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Denis H. Y. Leung

    (School of Economics and Social Sciences, Singapore Management University)

Abstract

Malaria remains a major epidemiological problem in many developing countries. Malaria is de ned as the presence of parasites and symptoms (usually fever) due to the parasites. In endemic areas, an individual may have symptoms attributable either to malaria or to other causes. From a clinical point of view, it is important to correctly diagnose an individual who has developed symptoms so that the appropriate treatments can be given. From an epidemiologic and economic point of view, it is important to determine the proportion of malaria affected cases in individuals who have symptoms so that policies on intervention programmes can be developed. Once symptoms have developed in an individual, the diagnosis of malaria can be based on analysis of the parasite levels in blood samples. However, even a blood test is not conclusive as in endemic areas, many healthy individuals can have parasites in their blood slides. Therefore, data from this type of studies can be viewed as coming from a mixture distribution, with the components corresponding to malaria and nonmalaria cases. A unique feature in this type of data, however, is the fact that a proportion of the non-malaria cases have zero parasite levels. Therefore, one of the component distribu-tions is itself a mixture distribution. In this article, we propose a semi-parametric likelihood approach for estimating the proportion of clinical malaria using parasite level data from a group of individuals with symptoms. Our approach assumes the density ratio for the parasite levels in clinical malaria and non-clinical malaria cases can be modeled using a logistic model. We use empirical likelihood to combine the zero and non-zero data. The maximum semi-parametric likelihood estimate is more ecient than existing non-parametric estimates using only the frequencies of zero and non-zero data. On the other hand, it is more robust than a fully parametric maximum likelihood estimate that assumes a parametric model for the non-zero data. Simulation results show that the performance of the proposed method is satisfactory. The proposed method is used to analyze data from a malaria survey carried out in Tanzania.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Qin & Denis H. Y. Leung, 2004. "A Semi-parametric Two-component “Compound” Mixture Model and Its Application to Estimating Malaria Attributable Fractions," Working Papers 17-2004, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:siu:wpaper:17-2004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mercury.smu.edu.sg/rsrchpubupload/3228/malaria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Qin & Marianne Berwick & Rosie Ashbolt & Terry Dwyer, 2002. "Quantifying the Change of Melanoma Incidence by Breslow Thickness," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 665-670, September.
    2. F. Zou, 2002. "On empirical likelihood for a semiparametric mixture model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 61-75, March.
    3. Lancaster, Tony & Imbens, Guido, 1996. "Case-control studies with contaminated controls," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 145-160.
    4. G. D. Murray & D. M. Titterington, 1978. "Estimation Problems with Data from a Mixture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 27(3), pages 325-334, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Cheng & Jing Qin & Biao Zhang, 2009. "Semiparametric estimation and inference for distributional and general treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 881-904, September.
    2. Jing Qin & Kung-Yee Liang, 2011. "Hypothesis Testing in a Mixture Case–Control Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 182-193, March.
    3. Yufan Wang & Xingzhong Xu, 2023. "A Posterior p -Value for Homogeneity Testing of the Three-Sample Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Yang Ning & Yong Chen, 2015. "A Class of Pseudolikelihood Ratio Tests for Homogeneity in Exponential Tilt Mixture Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 504-517, June.
    5. Liugen Xue, 2010. "Empirical Likelihood Local Polynomial Regression Analysis of Clustered Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(4), pages 644-663, December.
    6. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2020. "Causal Inference under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Papers 2004.08318, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    7. Esmerelda A. Ramalho & Richard Smith, 2003. "Discrete choice non-response," CeMMAP working papers 07/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Erard, Brian & Langetieg, Patrick & Payne, Mark & Plumley, Alan, 2020. "Ghosts in the Income Tax Machinery," MPRA Paper 100036, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Amanda Coston & Edward H. Kennedy, 2022. "The role of the geometric mean in case-control studies," Papers 2207.09016, arXiv.org.
    10. Ashton, John & Burnett, Tim & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Giovanni Compiani & Yuichi Kitamura, 2016. "Using mixtures in econometric models: a brief review and some new results," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(3), pages 95-127, October.
    12. Vincenzo Caponi & Miana Plesca, 2014. "Empirical characteristics of legal and illegal immigrants in the USA," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 923-960, October.
    13. Moming Li & Guoqing Diao & Jing Qin, 2020. "On symmetric semiparametric two‐sample problem," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1216-1228, December.
    14. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae (Simon) Lee, 2020. "Causal inference in case-control studies," CeMMAP working papers CWP19/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Lee, Kangbok & Joo, Sunghoon & Baik, Hyeoncheol & Han, Sumin & In, Joonhwan, 2020. "Unbalanced data, type II error, and nonlinearity in predicting M&A failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 271-287.
    16. Wang, Chunlin & Marriott, Paul & Li, Pengfei, 2017. "Testing homogeneity for multiple nonnegative distributions with excess zero observations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 146-157.
    17. Konis, Kjell & Fokianos, Konstantinos, 2009. "Safe density ratio modeling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(18), pages 1915-1920, September.
    18. Becker, Bo & Cronqvist, Henrik & Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, 2011. "Estimating the Effects of Large Shareholders Using a Geographic Instrument," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 907-942, August.
    19. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.
    20. Gill Ward & Trevor Hastie & Simon Barry & Jane Elith & John R. Leathwick, 2009. "Presence-Only Data and the EM Algorithm," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 554-563, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:siu:wpaper:17-2004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: QL THor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesmusg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.