IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2604525.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

European Quartet of Missed Opportunities for Internet Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Radka MacGregor Pelikanova

    (Metropolitan University Prague)

Abstract

Who controls the Internet? Conventionally, it is assumed that the hegemony, if not monopoly, of the U.S. Government over the Internet governance is a fait accompli generated by the historic evolution, as well as the economic and political power which the USA asserted in an almost aggressive manner. This assumption is the result of a set of myths and misinformation and deserves to be corrected while presenting both American and European perspectives, in the context of the real managerial and technical setting. This black-and-white perception is to be rejected and replaced by a colorful mosaic showing that a set of misunderstandings and aborted opportunities shaped the pathway to the status quo. An active and strong impact over the Internet governance was several times close to European hands, and it is highly instructive to analyze these situations where Europeans did not manage to get involved in the top Internet management. Four decades, four sets of opportunities and four failures for many business management and other reasons are detailed. Considering the global situation, Europeans cannot afford repeating such mistakes. Taking into account the current stage of the relationship between the EU and USA, especially Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, a consensus, or at least a respected tolerance, of the management of the Internet and governance over it is critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Radka MacGregor Pelikanova, 2015. "European Quartet of Missed Opportunities for Internet Governance," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604525, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/17th-international-academic-conference-vienna/table-of-content/detail?cid=26&iid=057&rid=4525
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Demissie Alemayehu, 2014. "Methodological Considerations in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 0401651, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Alfonso Ávila-Robinson & Kumiko Miyazaki, 2013. "Evolutionary paths of change of emerging nanotechnological innovation systems: the case of ZnO nanostructures," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 829-849, June.
    3. Kaplan, Andreas, 2014. "European management and European business schools: Insights from the history of business schools," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 529-534.
    4. Iwona Pawlas, 2014. "Competitiveness of the Polish Economy against the Background of Other European Union Member States. Selected issues," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0201336, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radka MacGregor Pelikanova & Robert K. MacGregor, 2015. "Internet governance and its legitimacy - from rethoric to facts and even beyond," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 77-103, November.
    2. repec:sek:jijobm:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:77-102 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rasche, Andreas, 2015. "The corporation as a political actor – European and North American perspectives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 4-8.
    4. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2016. "Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 441-450.
    5. Pucciarelli, Francesca & Kaplan, Andreas, 2016. "Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-320.
    6. Sánchez-Bayón, Antonio & Trincado Aznar, Estrella, 2021. "Spanish Business Schools paradox and the accreditation system expiry: when the success becomes a risk," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 30(2), pages 1-18.
    7. Alam, Gazi Mahabubul & Giacosa, Elisa & Mazzoleni, Alberto, 2022. "Does MBA’s paradigm transformation follow business education’s philosophy? A comparison of academic and job-performance and SES among five types of MBAian," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 881-892.
    8. Alain Béraud & Guy Numa, 2019. "Retrospectives: Lord Keynes and Mr. Say: A Proximity of Ideas," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 228-242, Summer.
    9. Poulis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Complexity as an empirical tendency: Promoting non-measurement as a means to enhanced understanding," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 487-496.
    10. Jacqmin, Julien & Lefebvre, Mathieu, 2021. "The effect of international accreditations on students’ revealed preferences: Evidence from French Business schools," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Rotolo, Daniele & Hicks, Diana & Martin, Ben R., 2015. "What is an emerging technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1827-1843.
    12. Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde & Lee Ohanian, 2018. "The Lack of European Productivity Growth: Causes and Lessons for the U.S," PIER Working Paper Archive 18-024, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 07 Sep 2018.
    13. Houldsworth, Elizabeth & McBain, Richard & Brewster, Chris, 2019. "‘One MBA?’ How context impacts the development of post-MBA career outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 432-441.
    14. T. Gorjiara & C. Baldock, 2014. "Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: a comparison between Australia and the rest of the world," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 121-148, July.
    15. Kaplan, Andreas, 2018. "A school is “a building that has four walls…with tomorrow inside”: Toward the reinvention of the business school," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 599-608.
    16. Julien Jacqmin & Mathieu Lefebvre, 2021. "The effect of international accreditations on students’ decisions: Evidence from French business schools," Working Papers of BETA 2021-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    17. Thara Prabhakaran & Hiran H. Lathabai & Susan George, 2019. "Competing, complementary and co-existing paradigms in techno-scientific literature: A case study of Nanotechnology for engineering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 941-977, March.
    18. Yoon, Hyungseok & Belkhouja, Mustapha & Wei, Yingqi & Lee, Sangho, 2021. "Born to be similar? Global isomorphism and the emergence of latecomer business schools," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    19. Streukens, Sandra & Leroi-Werelds, Sara, 2016. "Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 618-632.
    20. Adrien Jean-Guy Passant, 2016. "Issues in European business education in the mid-nineteenth century: a comparative perspective," Post-Print hal-03658709, HAL.
    21. Moehrle, Martin G. & Caferoglu, Hüseyin, 2019. "Technological speciation as a source for emerging technologies. Using semantic patent analysis for the case of camera technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 776-784.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU; DNS; Governance; ICANN; Internet.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.