IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1003266.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing ERP Software Evaluation Procedure for a Governmental Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Kerim Goztepe

    (Army War College)

  • Sahin CETIN

    (Army War College)

  • Alper Kayaalp

    (Army War College)

Abstract

An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is regarded a solution approach for any organization. It is an information system to plan and manage whole firms? or organizations? function. Once it is adopted, it provides many useful tools in management. This study expose an evaluation procedure of ERP software selection for any governmental organization. The proposed evaluation framework use step by step process in order to reach final decision. It also advise some decision making techniques for ERP alternatives applying selected criteria. It is a fact that an ERP software cannot meet all needed company functionalities of a governmental organization. Thus, organization must choose a flexible ERP system for its requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerim Goztepe & Sahin CETIN & Alper Kayaalp, 2015. "Designing ERP Software Evaluation Procedure for a Governmental Organization," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003266, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=060&rid=3266
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Chun-Chin & Chien, Chen-Fu & Wang, Mao-Jiun J., 2005. "An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 47-62, April.
    2. Umble, Elisabeth J. & Haft, Ronald R. & Umble, M. Michael, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 241-257, April.
    3. Adina UTA & Iulian INTORSUREANU & Rodica MIHALCA, 2007. "Criteria for the selection of ERP software," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 0(2), pages 63-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan AL JAFA, 2020. "A Case Study For The Crm Software Selection Process In A Transportation Company Using An Integrated Ahp And Qfd Approach," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 24, pages 337-351, December.
    2. Molnár Bálint & Benczúr András & Szabó Gyula, 2013. "Selection Process of ERP Systems," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 36-48, March.
    3. B S Ahn & S H Choi, 2008. "ERP system selection using a simulation-based AHP approach: a case of Korean homeshopping company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 322-330, March.
    4. Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Dimitra Skoumpopoulou & Catherine Moss, 2018. "The Importance of Culture in ERP Adoption – A Case Study Analysis," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(3), pages 259-278, July.
    6. Hasan AL JAFA, 2020. "Improving Erp Software Selection Process By Integrating Qfd With Ahp Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 16, pages 157-167, December.
    7. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Yao-Chuan Chan, 2019. "An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Mohammad AL-Zoubi, 2018. "The Role of Technology, Organization, and Environment Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Success in Jordan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 48-65, August.
    9. Akca Yasar & Gokhan Ozer, 2016. "Determination the Factors that Affect the Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Information System through Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-91, September.
    10. Ge, Liping & Voß, Stefan, 2009. "ERP application in China: An overview," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 501-507, November.
    11. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    12. Juha Lukkarinen & Jukka Majava, 2020. "Supplies Inventory Management in a Corporation Context: A Case Study," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 9(2), pages 169-184.
    13. Umble, Michael & Umble, Elisabeth J., 2006. "Utilizing buffer management to improve performance in a healthcare environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1060-1075, October.
    14. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. S. Valsamidis & A. Mandilas & M. Nikolaidis & P. Polychronidou, 2009. "ERP PACKAGE EVALUATION, THE CASE OF SMEs KAVALA's REGION," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-1.
    16. S H Choi & S M Bae, 2009. "Strategic information systems selection with incomplete preferences: a case of a Korean electronics company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 180-190, February.
    17. Bradley, Joseph, 2008. "Management based critical success factors in the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 175-200.
    18. Rađenović Žarko & Veselinović Ivana, 2017. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.
    19. Kevin Kam Fung Yuen, 2022. "Decision models for information systems planning using primitive cognitive network process: comparisons with analytic hierarchy process," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1759-1785, July.
    20. Malgorzata Plaza, 2008. "Team performance and information system implementation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 347-359, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP); Organization; ERP evaluation procedure; Decision making.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.