IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sec/cnrepo/0023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Banking Sector Systemic Risk in Selected Cenral European Countries. Review of: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Kawalec

Abstract

The paper is an attempt at a comparative overview of banking sector systemic risk in six Central European countries as of the end of 1997 concluding with some policy recommendations. The countries covered by the paper (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) are specific by the fact that in the early 1990’s they moved from a socialist to a market economy and the legacy of a socialist economy still has an important influence in the shape of their banking sectors. All six countries underwent banking crisis in 1990s and spent significant budgetary resources to deal with them. Crises have been overcome without system destabilization only in Hungary and Poland. Now, the banking sectors in these two countries are relatively robust although small in relation to GDP. In Bulgaria a banking crisis ended with a major destabilization, dramatic downsizing of banking assets and a deep recession. Presently, the banking sector is reported to be liquid and solvent and the potential for assets quality deterioration is limited for some time. Romania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia have yet to deal with their continuing banking crises, which still constitute a danger for economic stability and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Kawalec, 1999. "Banking Sector Systemic Risk in Selected Cenral European Countries. Review of: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia," CASE Network Reports 0023, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:sec:cnrepo:0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://case-research.eu/upload/publikacja_plik/2987884_report%2023%20pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Monetary Fund, 1998. "Hungary: Economic Policies for Sustainable Growth," IMF Occasional Papers 1998/003, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jokipii, Terhi & Lucey, Brian, 2007. "Contagion and interdependence: Measuring CEE banking sector co-movements," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 71-96, March.
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2006_015 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Terhi Jokipii & Brian Lucey, 2005. "CEE Banking Sector Co-Movement: Contagion or Interdependence?," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp077, IIIS.
    4. Thomas Reininger & Franz Schardax & Martin Summer, 2002. "Financial System Transition in Central Europe: The First Decades," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 16 edited by Morten Balling, May.
    5. Jokipii, Terhi & Lucey, Brian, 2007. "Contagion and interdependence: Measuring CEE banking sector co-movements," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 71-96, March.
    6. Hegedüs, József & Somogyi, Eszter & Augustyniak, Hanna & Csizmady, Adrienne & Laszek, Jacek & Olszewski, Krzysztof, 2019. "Posztszocialista lakásrendszerek Magyarországon és Lengyelországban [Post-socialist housing systems in Hungary and Poland]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 980-1004.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liliana Varela, 2018. "Reallocation, Competition, and Productivity: Evidence from a Financial Liberalization Episode," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(2), pages 1279-1313.
    2. Liliana Varela, 2018. "Reallocation, Competition, and Productivity: Evidence from a Financial Liberalization Episode," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 85(2), pages 1279-1313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sec:cnrepo:0023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Budzynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caseepl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.