A Rethink on Measuring Health Inequalities Using the Gini Coefficient
AbstractObjective- We show that a standardized Gini coefficient that takes into account the feasible range of health inequality for a given health attribute is a better instrument than the normal Gini coefficient for quantifying inter-individual health inequality. Methods- The standardized Gini coefficient is equal to the normal Gini coefficient divided by the maximal attainable Gini coefficient, which is computed based on the maximal level of a health attribute an individual could achieve. Both the old and new coefficients are used to estimate the lifespan inequality of 185 countries for year 1990, 2000 and 2006, respectively. The results are then compared both across countries and over time. Findings- Firstly, the standardized Gini coefficient can still be related to the Lorenz curve. Secondly, changes in standardized Gini coefficients can be decomposed into respectively the change in the distribution of health outcomes and the change in the average health outcomes. Thirdly, the standardized Gini coefficient provides richer information and often gives different conclusions regarding health inequality in individual countries as well as country ranking, as compared to the normal Gini coefficient. Conclusion- Accounting for the maximal level of health attribute an individual could achieve is important when measuring health inequality. The proposed standardized Gini coefficient can provide more accurate information regarding the actual level of health inequality in a society than the normal Gini coefficient
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia in its series Discussion Papers Series with number 381.
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Dennis Petriea & Kam Ki Tang & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2009.
"Measuring Avoidable Health Inequality with Realization of Conditional Potential Life Years (RCPLY),"
Discussion Papers Series
395, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
- Dennis Petrie & Kam Ki Tang & D.S. Prasada Rao, 2009. "Measuring Avoidable Health Inequality with Realization of Conditional Potential Life Years (RCPLY)," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 224, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
- Petrie, Dennis & Tang, Kam Ki & Prasada Rao, D. S., 2009. "Measuring Avoidable Health Inequality with Realization of Conditional Potential Life Years (RCPLY)," SIRE Discussion Papers 2009-36, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
- Becchetti, Leonardo & Massari, Riccardo & Naticchioni, Paolo, 2013.
"The Drivers of Happiness Inequality: Suggestions for Promoting Social Cohesion,"
IZA Discussion Papers
7153, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Leonardo Becchetti & Riccardo Massari & Paolo Naticchioni, 2011. "The drivers of happiness inequality: Suggestions for promoting social cohesion," Working Papers 2011-06, Universita' di Cassino, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Randal Anderson).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.