Optimal Cities with Indivisibility in Production and Interactions Between Firms
AbstractA spatial model of cities is constructed by combining interaction costs between firms with indivisibility in production. The optimal allocation requires Pigouvian subsidies to firms and the externality version of the Henry George Theorem is obtained: at the optimal city size, the total Pigouvian subsidy equals the total differential land rent in a city. We also obtain conditions under which monocentric configuration is optimal and perform comparative statics concerning changes in various parameters on the optimal city size.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 597.
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: 1985
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Kanemoto, Yoshitsugu, 1990. "Optimal cities with indivisibility in production and interactions between firms," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-59, January.
- L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
- L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
- L68 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Appliances; Furniture; Other Consumer Durables
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Kanemoto, Yoshitsugu, 2013.
"Second-best cost–benefit analysis in monopolistic competition models of urban agglomeration,"
Journal of Urban Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 83-92.
- Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2012. "Second-Best Cost-Benefit Analysis in Monopolistic Competition Models of Urban Agglomeration," GRIPS Discussion Papers 11-21, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2011.
"Second-Best Cost?Benefit Analysis with a Microfoundation of Urban Agglomeration,"
GRIPS Discussion Papers
11-03, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2011. "Second-Best Cost-Benefit Analysis with a Microfoundation of Urban Agglomeration," ERSA conference papers ersa11p439, European Regional Science Association.
- Ito, Junichi, 2002. "Why TVES have contributed to interregional imbalances in China:," EPTD discussion papers 91, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Tripathi, Sabyasachi, 2012. "Estimating Urban Agglomeration Economies for India: A New Economic Geography Perspective," MPRA Paper 43501, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Berg, Nathan, 2008. "Imitation in location choice," MPRA Paper 26592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2012. "Cost-Benefit Analysis in Monopolistic Competition Models of Urban Agglomeration," GRIPS Discussion Papers 12-04, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- John Hartwick & Andrei Bazhanov, 2007. "On Beckmann's Dispersed "Interaction City"," Working Papers 1170, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
- Bazhanov, Andrei & Hartwick, John, 2006. "Dispersed Interactions of Urban Residents," MPRA Paper 766, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.