IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/69196.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Katılım Bankaları Mevduat Bankalarından Farklı mı Çalışıyor
[Performance Differentiation Between Participation (Islamic) Banks and Deposit Banks in Turkey]

Author

Listed:
  • Sakarya, Burchan
  • Kaya, Yasemin

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren mevduat ve katılım bankaların karşılaştırmalı analizini yapmak ve katılım bankalarının hangi alanlarda farklılaştığını irdelemektir. Bu çerçeve katılım bankacılığı için ifade edilen en önemli önermelerin sınanması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu önermelerden ilki katılım bankalarla geleneksel ticari bankalar arasında özkaynak açısından farklılığın bulunmasıdır. Diğer bir önemli önerme (veya ön kabul) ise, katılım bankalarının ile ticari bankalardan aktif kalitesi ve kârlılık açısından farklılık arz etmesidir. Çalışmada 2005-2012 döneminde Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan mevduat bankaları ile katılım bankaları panel veri yöntemi ile incelenmiş ve katılım bankalarının daha yüksek özkaynakla çalışarak, finansal aracılık faaliyetlerine odaklanırken, diğer bankalardan etkinlik ve kârlılık açsından bir farklılık arz etmedikleridir. The main goal of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis between participation banks and deposit banks operating in Turkey and investigate the main areas of differentiation. In this context, the fundamental propositions are investigated. First off, the proposition that the participation banks operate with a differentiated capital adequacy structure is tested. Than the other presumption of that these peer groups differ from the asset quality and profitability perspective is analyzed. We examine the Turkish banking system for the 2005-2012 period. The mentioned propositions are tested using panel data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakarya, Burchan & Kaya, Yasemin, 2013. "Katılım Bankaları Mevduat Bankalarından Farklı mı Çalışıyor [Performance Differentiation Between Participation (Islamic) Banks and Deposit Banks in Turkey]," MPRA Paper 69196, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:69196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69196/1/MPRA_paper_69196.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asli Demirguk-Kunt & Thorsten Beck & Ouarda Merrouche, 2013. "Islamic Banking versus Conventional Banking: Business model, Efficiency, and Stability," Post-Print hal-01638080, HAL.
    2. Kablan, S & Yousfi, O, 2011. "Efficiency of islamic and conventional banks in countries with islamic banking," MPRA Paper 32951, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    4. Martin Čihák & Heiko Hesse, 2010. "Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 38(2), pages 95-113, December.
    5. Abdus Samad, 1999. "Comparative Efficiency Of The Islamic Bank Vis-A-Vis Conventional Banks In Malaysia," IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, IIUM Journal of Economis and Management, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Chong, Beng Soon & Liu, Ming-Hua, 2009. "Islamic banking: Interest-free or interest-based?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 125-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pejman Abedifar & Shahid M. Ebrahim & Philip Molyneux & Amine Tarazi, 2015. "Islamic Banking And Finance: Recent Empirical Literature And Directions For Future Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 637-670, September.
    2. Aysan, Ahmet F. & Disli, Mustafa & Duygun, Meryem & Ozturk, Huseyin, 2018. "Religiosity versus rationality: Depositor behavior in Islamic and conventional banks," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-19.
    3. Asmild, Mette & Kronborg, Dorte & Mahbub, Tasmina & Matthews, Kent, 2019. "The efficiency patterns of Islamic banks during the global financial crisis: The case of Bangladesh," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 67-74.
    4. Ahmet F. Aysan & Mustafa Disli & Huseyin Ozturk, 2018. "Bank lending channel in a dual banking system: Why are Islamic banks so responsive?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 674-698, March.
    5. Baele, Lieven & Farooq, Moazzam & Ongena, Steven, 2014. "Of religion and redemption: Evidence from default on Islamic loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-159.
    6. Sakarya, Burchan, 2016. "Financial Stability of Islamic (Participation) Banks in Turkey," MPRA Paper 69451, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ibrahim, Mansor H., 2016. "Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 127-134.
    8. Houcem Smaou & Hatem Ghouma, 2019. "Sukuk Market Development and Islamic Banks’ Capital Ratios," Working Papers 1329, Economic Research Forum, revised 21 Aug 2019.
    9. Moazzam Farooq & Sweder van Wijnbergen & Sajjad Zaheer, 2015. "Will Islamic Banking make the World less risky? An Empirical Analysis of Capital Structure, Risk Shifting and Financial Stability," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-051/VI/DSF92, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Albaity, Mohamed & Noman, Abu Hanifa Md. & Saadaoui Mallek, Ray & Al-Shboul, Mohammad, 2022. "Cyclicality of bank credit growth: Conventional vs Islamic banks in the GCC," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    11. Mamoru Nagano, 2016. "Who issues Sukuk and when?: An analysis of the determinants of Islamic bond issuance," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 45-55, November.
    12. Hassan, M. Kabir & Aliyu, Sirajo, 2018. "A contemporary survey of islamic banking literature," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 12-43.
    13. Vu Quang Trinh & Marwa Elnahass & Aly Salama, 2021. "Board busyness and new insights into alternative bank dividends models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1289-1328, May.
    14. Achraf Haddad & Anis El Ammari & Abdelfettah Bouri, 2019. "Are Islamic banks really more solvent than conventional banks in a financially stable period?," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(11), pages 346-366, November.
    15. Safiullah, Md & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2018. "Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 129-149.
    16. Khediri, Karim Ben & Charfeddine, Lanouar & Youssef, Slah Ben, 2015. "Islamic versus conventional banks in the GCC countries: A comparative study using classification techniques," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 75-98.
    17. Salma Louati & Younes Boujelbene, 2021. "Basel Regulations and Banks’ Risk-efficiency Nexus: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous-equation Models," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 578-602, October.
    18. Paolo Giudici & Shatha Hashem, 2015. "Systemic risk of Islamic Banks," DEM Working Papers Series 103, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    19. Athari, Seyed Alireza & Adaoglu, Cahit & Bektas, Eralp, 2016. "Investor protection and dividend policy: The case of Islamic and conventional banks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 100-117.
    20. Bitar, Mohammad & Madiès, Philippe & Taramasco, Ollivier, 2017. "What makes Islamic banks different? A multivariate approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 215-235.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Katılım bankaları; Islamic (participation) banks; panel data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:69196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.