IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/62961.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Power Plant Waste Heat Recovery for Household Heating Using Heat Pumps

Author

Listed:
  • Dosa, Ion

Abstract

This paper presents a model of a power plant condenser cooling circuit which has in addition to the classical cooling scheme heat pumps for waste heat recovery. Major source of loss for a thermal power plant is the heat rejected by the condenser which can be up to 48.9% of thermal energy at turbine inlet, depending on technology used for power generation. Heat rejected by the cooling water of condenser will end up in the environment through the use of a cooling tower or directly in rivers depending on the cooling scheme employed, producing thermal pollution. Based on the mathematical model, a study on the effect of heat recovery using power plant waste heat as heat source for heat pumps was carried out. The reference heat source temperature for the heat pump was 5 °C, while the condenser cooling water temperature at outlet was in the range of 22.96 °C in April to 14.99 °C in December. As expected high cooling water temperatures at condenser outlet will generate the highest practical COP which is 3.35 comparative to 2.84 for the reference case. Accordingly the smallest amount of work that needs to be supplied to the heat pump is 8.359 kW comparative to 9.861 kW for the reference case, resulting 1.502 kW savings. For the heating period from October to April the worst case scenario is for the temperatures in December when temperature of water at the outlet of condenser was minimal 14.99 °C. Even in this case, practical COP is 3.11 higher than 2.84 for reference case, and the amount of savings with the work supplied to heat pump is 0.869 kW. In closed loop operation, the temperature of returned water at the steam condenser inlet can be theoretically 5 °C (temperature at the outlet of heat pump evaporator) with all the benefits resulting from proper condenser cooling.

Suggested Citation

  • Dosa, Ion, 2014. "Power Plant Waste Heat Recovery for Household Heating Using Heat Pumps," MPRA Paper 62961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:62961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62961/1/MPRA_paper_62961.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srinivasan, Kalyan K. & Mago, Pedro J. & Krishnan, Sundar R., 2010. "Analysis of exhaust waste heat recovery from a dual fuel low temperature combustion engine using an Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2387-2399.
    2. Hung, T.C. & Shai, T.Y. & Wang, S.K., 1997. "A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 661-667.
    3. Leffler, Robert A. & Bradshaw, Craig R. & Groll, Eckhard A. & Garimella, Suresh V., 2012. "Alternative heat rejection methods for power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 17-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    2. Wang, Tianyou & Zhang, Yajun & Peng, Zhijun & Shu, Gequn, 2011. "A review of researches on thermal exhaust heat recovery with Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2862-2871, August.
    3. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    4. Shu, Gequn & Liu, Lina & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Yu, Guopeng, 2014. "Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1188-1198.
    5. Fu, Jianqin & Liu, Jingping & Xu, Zhengxin & Ren, Chengqin & Deng, Banglin, 2013. "A combined thermodynamic cycle based on methanol dissociation for IC (internal combustion) engine exhaust heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 778-786.
    6. Song, Jian & Song, Yin & Gu, Chun-wei, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery system for marine diesel engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 976-985.
    7. Mat Nawi, Z. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Sheikh Abdullah, S.R. & Lam, S.S., 2019. "The potential of exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) from marine diesel engines via organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    8. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    9. Li, You-Rong & Wang, Jian-Ning & Du, Mei-Tang, 2012. "Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 503-509.
    10. Wang, Dongxiang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Liu, Lin & Tao, LanLan, 2013. "Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 343-352.
    11. Wang, Hailei & Peterson, Richard & Harada, Kevin & Miller, Erik & Ingram-Goble, Robbie & Fisher, Luke & Yih, James & Ward, Chris, 2011. "Performance of a combined organic Rankine cycle and vapor compression cycle for heat activated cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 447-458.
    12. Zhou, Jianzhao & Chu, Yin Ting & Ren, Jingzheng & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Integrating machine learning and mathematical programming for efficient optimization of operating conditions in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based combined systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    13. Xie, Hui & Yang, Can, 2013. "Dynamic behavior of Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery of heavy duty diesel engines under driving cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 130-141.
    14. Javanshir, Alireza & Sarunac, Nenad, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of a simple Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 85-96.
    15. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    16. Roy, J.P. & Mishra, M.K. & Misra, Ashok, 2010. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5049-5062.
    17. Vuarnoz, D. & Kitanovski, A. & Gonin, C. & Borgeaud, Y. & Delessert, M. & Meinen, M. & Egolf, P.W., 2012. "Quantitative feasibility study of magnetocaloric energy conversion utilizing industrial waste heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 229-237.
    18. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    19. Zhao, Ying-Kun & Lei, Biao & Wu, Yu-Ting & Zhi, Rui-Ping & Wang, Wei & Guo, Hang & Ma, Chong-Fang, 2018. "Experimental study on the net efficiency of an Organic Rankine Cycle with single screw expander in different seasons," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 769-775.
    20. Mamat, Aman M.I. & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Martinez-Botas, Ricardo F., 2014. "Characterisation of a low pressure turbine for turbocompounding applications in a heavily downsized mild-hybrid gasoline engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 3-16.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    waste heat; heat recovery; heat pump; condenser cooling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:62961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.