Based on a general equilibrium model, we derive a relative price function which can be decomposed into productivity and quality effects. We then develop a method for inferring relative quality changes and apply that to US services versus US goods using NIPA data from 1946-2005. First, relative quality was decreasing after 1946 and has been increasing since the 1970s. Second, relative productivity and quality are negatively correlated, suggesting an endogenous link between the two. Third, productivity changes alone cannot fully explain the evolution of the services-goods relative price. This suggests that ignoring quality variations when explaining relative prices or exchange rates can lead to incorrect conclusions.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
225.
Find related papers by JEL classification: E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Mark Bils & Peter J. Klenow, 2001.
"Quantifying Quality Growth,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1006-1030, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: