IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/115533.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Правни И Икономически Аспекти На Държавния Контрол За Спазване На Трудовото Законодателство
[Legal and economic aspects of state control over compliance with labour legislation]

Author

Listed:
  • Yolova, Galina
  • Andreeva, Andriyana
  • Blagoycheva, Hristina
  • Dimitrova, Darina
  • Nedyalkova, Plamena
  • Bogdanov, Hristosko

Abstract

The realization of the constitutionally guaranteed right to work and the related subjective labour rights have been and will always be a serious challenge for legislation and legal doctrine. In this sense, state control over compliance with labour legislation has been a constant companion in the development of labour legislation, with the institute changing and evolving in accordance with the development of social relations at the particular stage and the related needs for adequate protection of rights. In the current moment, the modern forms of digitalization of labor and the increasingly aggressive use of artificial intelligence in employment relations poses in front of both legislation and doctrine qualitatively different challenges, requiring the introduction of new, adaptive to the new social realities normative means to protect the interests of working persons. Over the last twenty-five years, new non-standard forms of work have emerged, significantly changing concepts and standards in terms of employment position, social security, organisation, location and working time periods. This determines the relevance of the development of the control of compliance with labour legislation. The authors have used an interdisciplinary approach to conduct the research by combining a legal with an economic approach in analyzing the nature and aspects of control. In this way, a comprehensive study of the legal institute of labour law compliance control, not conducted in doctrine, is provided. The scientific objective of the monographic work is a comprehensive - both doctrinal and theoretical, analysis and study of the control mechanisms for compliance with labour legislation, examined through the prism of normative systematics and in the aspect of their economic effects on traditional and alternative forms of employment. The object of the study is the current normative framework regulating the state control of compliance with labour legislation and the practical impact of its implementation. The study is structured in a classical content of two parts with their respective chapters, in which different aspects of the state control of compliance with labour legislation are analyzed in interrelation. The two parts correspond to the two axes around which the research is conducted, namely legal and economic aspects of state control. In this interrelation, the legal and economic aspects of the monographic work serve not only the legal and economic doctrine enriching in a theoretical perspective the institute of the control of compliance with the labor legislation, but are also useful for the practice and, in particular, the control institutions and the subjects of the labor legal relationship. In conclusion and on the basis of the legal and economic analysis carried out in the individual parts, substantiated conclusions, specific legislative proposals and recommendations to the control institutions are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Yolova, Galina & Andreeva, Andriyana & Blagoycheva, Hristina & Dimitrova, Darina & Nedyalkova, Plamena & Bogdanov, Hristosko, 2022. "Правни И Икономически Аспекти На Държавния Контрол За Спазване На Трудовото Законодателство [Legal and economic aspects of state control over compliance with labour legislation]," MPRA Paper 115533, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:115533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/115533/1/MPRA_paper_115533.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kässi, Otto & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 241-248.
    2. Feldstein, Martin, 1997. "How Big Should Government Be?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 50(2), pages 197-213, June.
    3. Daniel Alonso Soto, 2020. "Technology and the future of work in emerging economies: What is different," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 236, OECD Publishing.
    4. Liu Shi & Shaomeng Li & Xiaolan Fu, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Technological Innovation and Firm Wages: Firm-level Evidence from OECD Economies," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 89-125.
    5. Maya Lambovska, 2018. "A Model for control on teams," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 3-19.
    6. Hristina Blagoycheva & Andriyana Andreeva & Galina Yolova, 2019. "Obligation and Responsibility of Employers to Provide Health and Safety at Work – Principles, Current Regulation and Prospects," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 115-137.
    7. Sara Rica & Amaia Iza, 2005. "Career Planning in Spain: Do Fixed-term Contracts Delay Marriage and Parenthood?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 49-73, November.
    8. Feldstein, Martin, 1997. "How Big Should Government Be?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 50(2), pages 197-213, June.
    9. Barrios, John M. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Yi, Hanyi, 2018. "The Cost of Convenience: Ridesharing and Traffic Fatalities," Working Papers 282, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Slemrod, Joel, 1998. "Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Taxable Income Elasticities," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 51(n. 4), pages 773-88, December.
    2. Ming Chung Chang & Shufen Wu, 2011. "Should Marginal Cost of Public Funds include the Revenue Effect?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 147(I), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Shih‐Ying Wu, 2005. "The Tax Effect on Taxable Income from Privately Held Businesses," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(4), pages 891-912, April.
    4. Santos, Marcelo Rodrigues dos & Pereira, Thiago Neves, 2010. "Moving to a Consumption-Based Tax System: A Quantitative Assessment for Brazil," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 64(2), June.
    5. Ian W.H. Parry & Antonio M. Bento, 2002. "Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and the "Double Dividend" Hypothesis," Chapters, in: Lawrence H. Goulder (ed.), Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, chapter 22, pages 397-426, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Salvador Barrios & Jonathan Pycroft & Bert Saveyn, 2013. "The marginal cost of public funds in the EU: the case of labour versus green taxes," Taxation Papers 35, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    7. Frits Bos & Thomas van der Pol & Gerbert Romijn, 2018. "Should CBA’s include a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation?," CPB Discussion Paper 370.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Hoel, Michael, 2008. "Environmental Taxes in an Economy with Distorting Taxes and a Heterogeneous Population," Memorandum 04/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    9. Slemrod, Joel & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2001. "Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Marginal Benefit of Projects," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 54(2), pages 189-202, June.
    10. Michael Spackman, 2013. "Government Time Discounting and Required Rates of Return: UK History and Current Issues," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 190-206, June.
    11. Jan Pavel & Leoš Vítek, 2015. "Vyvolané náklady daňového systému v ČR [Compliance Costs of the Czech Tax System]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(3), pages 317-330.
    12. Massimo Florio & Sara Colautti, 2001. "A logistic growth law for government expenditures: an explanatory analysis," Departmental Working Papers 2001-13, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    13. Thomas Gaube, 2005. "Public Investment and Income Taxation: Redistribution vs. Productive Performance," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Laura Varela-Candamio & Jesús López-Rodríguez, 2022. "Tax reforms in Spain: efficiency levels and distributional patterns," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 41-68, January.
    15. Mario Mariniello, 2013. "Should Variable Cost Aid to Attract Foreign Direct Investment be Banned? A European Perspective," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 273-308, June.
    16. Slemrod, Joel, 1998. "Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Taxable Income Elasticities," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 51(4), pages 773-788, December.
    17. Magazzino, Cosimo & Forte, Francesco, 2010. "Optimal size of government and economic growth in EU-27," MPRA Paper 26669, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Mickaël Beaud & Thierry Blayac & Patrice Bougette & Soufiane Khoudmi & Philippe Mahenc & Stéphane Mussard, 2013. "Estimation du coût d'opportunité des fonds publics pour l'économie française," Working Papers halshs-01077141, HAL.
    19. Massimo Florio & Sara Colautti, 2005. "A logistic growth theory of public expenditures: A study of five countries over 100 years," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 355-393, March.
    20. Parry, Ian & Bento, Antonio, 1999. "Tax Deductible Spending, Environmental Policy, and the "Double Dividend" Hypothesis," RFF Working Paper Series dp-99-24, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    state control; labour legislation;

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:115533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.