IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/por/fepwps/573.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Piracy: Factors That Influence The Intention To Pirate – A Structural Equation Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rúben Meireles

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto)

  • Pedro Campos

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto and LIAAD INESC TEC)

Abstract

Faster internet connections are breaking most of the geographic barriers. At the same time, the huge digital content that have been generated in last years is motivating new forms of digital piracy. We know that piracy of copyrighted digital material has a huge impact on countries’ economy, being a major issue for the whole society and not only for content creators. The purpose of this paper is to investigate digital piracy intention. For that purpose, we have expanded the framework of the theory of planned behavior using the utility theory, the deterrence theory and other relevant constructs. Using data from students of a Portuguese university and high school, a sample of 590 questionnaires has been collected. Two models were developed and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The first considers the full sample (Full Model), while the second considers only those who had pirated (Pirate Model). The pirate model confirmed the existence of a significant and strong relation between past behavior and intention towards digital piracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rúben Meireles & Pedro Campos, 2016. "Digital Piracy: Factors That Influence The Intention To Pirate – A Structural Equation Model Approach," FEP Working Papers 573, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    • Handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/wp573.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sulaiman Al-Rafee & Ali E. Dashti, 2012. "A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Extended TPB: The Case of Digital Piracy," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 5-24, January.
    2. Brett Danaher & Michael D. Smith & Rahul Telang, 2014. "Piracy and Copyright Enforcement Mechanisms," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 25-61.
    3. Alain d’Astous & François Colbert & Daniel Montpetit, 2005. "Music Piracy on the Web – How Effective are Anti-Piracy Arguments? Evidence from the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 289-310, September.
    4. Ram D. Gopal & G. Lawrence Sanders, 1998. "International Software Piracy: Analysis of Key Issues and Impacts," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 380-397, December.
    5. Timothy Cronan & Sulaiman Al-Rafee, 2008. "Factors that Influence the Intention to Pirate Software and Media," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 527-545, April.
    6. Arthur Vany & W. Walls, 2007. "Estimating the Effects of Movie Piracy on Box-office Revenue," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 30(4), pages 291-301, June.
    7. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    8. Isaac Ehrlich, 1996. "Crime, Punishment, and the Market for Offenses," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 43-67, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borja, Karla & Dieringer, Suzanne, 2016. "Streaming or stealing? The complementary features between music streaming and music piracy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 86-95.
    2. Chechen Liao & Hong-Nan Lin & Yu-Ping Liu, 2010. "Predicting the Use of Pirated Software: A Contingency Model Integrating Perceived Risk with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 237-252, January.
    3. Mateja Kos Koklic & Monika Kukar-Kinney & Irena Vida, 2016. "Three-Level Mechanism of Consumer Digital Piracy: Development and Cross-Cultural Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 15-27, March.
    4. Charlotte Emily De Corte & Patrick Van Kenhove, 2017. "One Sail Fits All? A Psychographic Segmentation of Digital Pirates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 441-465, July.
    5. Casidy, Riza & Phau, Ian & Lwin, Michael, 2016. "The role of religious leaders on digital piracy attitude and intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 244-252.
    6. Liza Rybina, 2011. "Music Piracy in Transitional Post-Soviet Economies: Ethics, Legislation, and Expertise," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 1(1), pages 3-17, June.
    7. Hassan Aleassa & John Pearson & Scott McClurg, 2011. "Investigating Software Piracy in Jordan: An Extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 663-676, February.
    8. Cheolho Yoon, 2011. "Theory of Planned Behavior and Ethics Theory in Digital Piracy: An Integrated Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 405-417, May.
    9. Marc Bourreau & Marianne Lumeau & Francois Moreau & Jordana Viotto da Cruz, 2019. "Recent or Free? An Experimental Study of the Motivations for Pirating Movies," CESifo Working Paper Series 8036, CESifo.
    10. Domenico Sardanelli & Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano & Gianmaria Bottoni, 2019. "Lowering the pirate flag: a TPB study of the factors influencing the intention to pay for movie streaming services," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-574, September.
    11. Anastasiou Kartas & Sigi Goode, 2012. "Use, perceived deterrence and the role of software piracy in video game console adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 261-277, April.
    12. Timothy Paul Cronan & Jeffrey K. Mullins & David E. Douglas, 2018. "Further Understanding Factors that Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 197-220, January.
    13. Simon, Françoise, 2016. "Consumer adoption of No Junk Mail stickers: An extended planned behavior model assessing the respective role of store flyer attachment and perceived intrusiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 12-21.
    14. Ku-Yuan Lee & Li-Chi Lan & Jiun-Hao Wang & Chen-Ling Fang & Kun-Sun Shiao, 2014. "How to Reduce the Latent Social Risk of Disease: The Determinants of Vaccination against Rabies in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Kirsten Robertson & Lisa McNeill & James Green & Claire Roberts, 2012. "Illegal Downloading, Ethical Concern, and Illegal Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 215-227, June.
    16. Ciprian-Marcel Pop & Andreea–Ioana Romonti-Maniu & Monica-Maria Zaharie, 2017. "Opportunistic Consumer Behaviour in the Context of Digital Piracy," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    17. Liye Ma & Alan L. Montgomery & Param Vir Singh & Michael D. Smith, 2014. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Pre-Release Movie Piracy on Box Office Revenue," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 590-603, September.
    18. Amanda Chu & Patrick Chau & Mike So, 2015. "Explaining the Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace: A Dual-Process Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 209-225, September.
    19. Tyrowicz, Joanna & Krawczyk, Michal & Hardy, Wojciech, 2020. "Friends or foes? A meta-analysis of the relationship between “online piracy” and the sales of cultural goods," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Teemu Kautonen & Marco van Gelderen & Erno T. Tornikoski, 2011. "Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: a test of the theory of planned behaviour," Post-Print hal-00741505, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information and Internet Services; Computer Software; Digital Piracy; Theory of Planned Behavior; Deterrence Theory; Structural Equation Modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fepuppt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.