IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pid/kbrief/202282.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Review of Accountability Systems: Learning from Best Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Nasir Iqbal

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

  • Ghulam Mustafa

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, �accountability� has become Pakistan�s most famous political slogan (Mehboob, 2022). Despite numerous reforms in the accountability system, Pakistan got the worst ranking in the region based on the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) published by Transparency International (TI) (TI, 2022).[2] The CPI-based ranking shows that Pakistan ranked 140th out of 180 countries in 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasir Iqbal & Ghulam Mustafa, 2022. "A Review of Accountability Systems: Learning from Best Practices," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2022:82, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:kbrief:2022:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://file.pide.org.pk/uploads/kb-082-a-review-of-accountability-systems-learning-from-best-practices.pdf
    File Function: First Version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Philp, 2009. "Delimiting Democratic Accountability," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(1), pages 28-53, March.
    2. Nasir Iqbal & Musleh Ud Din & Ejaz Ghani, 2012. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Role of Democratic Institutions," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 51(3), pages 173-195.
    3. Gordon Boyce & Cindy Davids, 2009. "Conflict of Interest in Policing and the Public Sector," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(5), pages 601-640, September.
    4. Mark Philp, 2009. "Delimiting Democratic Accountability," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57, pages 28-53, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth & Fazekas, Mihály, 2020. "Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Kaisa Herne & Olli Lappalainen & Maija Setälä & Juha Ylisalo, 2022. "Accountability as a Warrant for Trust: An Experiment on Sanctions and Justifications in a Trust Game," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 615-648, November.
    3. Samson Tiki & Belinda Luke & Janet Mack, 2021. "Perceptions of bribery in Papua New Guinea’s public sector: Agency and structural influences," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 217-227, October.
    4. Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Arthur L Dahl & Ã…sa Persson, 2018. "The emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals and policy integration: Friend or foe?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1371-1390, December.
    5. Raphael Zumofen, 2016. "Public accountability: a summary analysis [Accountability publique - Une analyse synthétique]," Post-Print hal-03623871, HAL.
    6. Sidra Naeem & Rana Ejaz Ali Khan, 2021. "Fiscal Decentralization and Gender Equality in Developing Economies: Dynamics of Income Groups in Economies and Corruption," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(9), pages 745-761, September.
    7. Iftikhar Ahmad & Nasir Iqbal & Mahmood Khalid, 2021. "Fiscal Federalism in Pakistan: Need for a Revisit," PIDE Policy View Point 2021:33, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    8. Syed Shujaat AHMED & Asif JAVED, 2017. "The Effect of Public Sector Development Expenditures and Investment on Economic Growth: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 203-214, June.
    9. Kıvılcım Özge KARA, 2019. "Discussions on the Chance of Success and Efficiency of Fiscal Decentralisation," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 27(40).
    10. Saima Nawaz & Saba Anwar & Nasir Iqbal, 2021. "The Spatial Effects of Road Infrastructure on Employment in Pakistan: Quantifying the Role of Complementary Factors," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 309-330.
    11. Sehrish Shahzad & Bushra Yasmin, 2016. "Does Fiscal Decentralisation Matter for Poverty and Income Inequality in Pakistan?," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 781-802.
    12. Tristan Canare & Jamil Paolo Francisco & Rose Ann Camille Caliso, 2020. "Decentralization and Income Inequality in a Panel and Cross‐Section of Countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 543-579, May.
    13. I. Shovkun, 2018. "Industrial development in decentralized conditions: experience of leading industrial countries and conclusions for Ukraine," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 4, pages 38-64.
    14. Anum Ellahi, 2020. "Corruption, Tax Evasion, and Economic Development in Economies with Decentralised Tax Administrative System," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 419-438.
    15. Tristan Canare, 2022. "Decentralization and welfare: Evidence from a panel of countries," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 767-796, September.
    16. Jonathan Muringani, 2022. "Trust as a catalyst for regional growth in a decentralized Europe: The interplay between informal and formal institutions in driving economic growth," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1229-1249, November.
    17. Abd. Ghani, Judhiana & Grewal, Bhajan & Ahmed, Abdullahi D. & Mohamed Nor, Norashidah, 2019. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in Malaysia: A Market Preserving Federalism Perspective," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(1), pages 153-170.
    18. Qasim Raza & Hafsa Hina, 2016. "Fiscal Decentralisation, Provincial Economic Growth and Spillover Effects: A Spatial Panel Data Analysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 743-760.
    19. Ozieranski, Piotr & McKee, Martin & King, Lawrence, 2012. "The politics of health technology assessment in Poland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 178-193.
    20. Alberto ROMOLINI & Elena GORI & Silvia FISSI, 2015. "Public Corporate Governance and Performance Information in Local Utilities: The Different Perceptions of Politicians and Managers," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2015(25), pages 55-77, Decembre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:kbrief:2022:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.