This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Who Benefits from the Food-for-School Program and Tindahan Natin Program: Lessons in Targeting

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Manasan, Rosario G.
Cuenca, Janet S.
Abstract

The prevalence of hunger in the Philippines prompted the government to launch its hunger mitigation initiative in November 2005. The initiative consisted of two programs: the Food-for-School Program (FSP) and the Tindahan Natin Program (TNP). The FSP belongs to a class of social safety nets called conditional cash or in-kind transfers. There is a growing interest on these instruments worldwide because of evidence that they have not only been useful in providing assistance to poor families but more so because they have been found effective in securing investments in human capital among the poor. On the other hand, the TNP is a targeted food price subsidy program. Like other food price subsidy programs, it operates by lowering the price of certain food items. The lower food price effectively results in increased purchasing power that translates into an increase in the real income of beneficiaries.

The budget allocation for these programs has been increasing in recent years. One interesting question to ask now is: Who benefits from the government’s hunger mitigation program? The answer to this question has a large bearing on both the effectiveness and efficiency of the program. Given this perspective, the paper assesses the 1) distribution of the benefits from the FSP and TNP in 2006, and 2) implications on targeting of the use of public schools and day care centers as distribution points. In the process, it also draws some lessons in targeting.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps0710.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Philippine Institute for Development Studies in its series Discussion Papers with number DP 2007-10.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 31
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2007-10

Contact details of provider:
Postal: NEDA sa Makati Building, 106 Amorsolo St., Legaspi Village, Makati City,
Email:
Web page: http://www.pids.gov.ph/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Aniceto Orbeta).

Related research
Keywords: targeting Food-for-School Program (FSP) conditional cash transfers in-kind transfers leakage rate undercoverage rate Tindahan Natin Program hunger mitigation food price subsidy

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Glewwe, Paul & Jacoby, Hanan G. & King, Elizabeth M., 2001. "Early childhood nutrition and academic achievement: a longitudinal analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 345-368, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also indexes books.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-3.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.