Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A bioeconomic model for HookerÕs sea lion bycatch in New Zealand

Contents:

Author Info

  • Viktoria Kahui

    ()
    (Department of Economics, University of Otago)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries constrains the incidental capture of HookerÕs sea lions in trawl nets of the southern squid fishery by closing the season once an upper limit on sea lion deaths is reached. The regulatory measure is in fact a limit on effort since the number of sea lion deaths is calculated from an estimated mortality rate per standard unit of effort measured in tows. During recent years vessels have been observed to increase the median time per tow suggesting the industry is expanding the capacity of an unregulated input in response. This paper formalises the current situation analytically by constructing a bioeconomic model that captures the idiosyncrasies of the squid fishery and the imposed regulation. Reducing the regulatory constraint to an isoperimetric problem can show how the current management regime may skew incentives leading to the observed increase in tow time. An extension to the current regulatory framework by introducing a spatial dimension to the estimated sea lion mortality rate may lead to more efficient behaviour. Despite retaining an upper limit on sea lion deaths, the profit maximising squid industry is given the incentive to increase effort in areas of high squid density relative to sea lion density.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.business.otago.ac.nz/econ/research/discussionpapers/DP_1010.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2010
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Otago, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 1010.

    as in new window
    Length: 27 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 2010
    Date of revision: Sep 2010
    Handle: RePEc:otg:wpaper:1010

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: P.O. Box 56, Dunedin
    Phone: +64 3 479 8725
    Fax: 64 3 479 8171
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.business.otago.ac.nz/econ
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: sea lion bycatch; squid fishery; bioeconomic model; regulation;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Kerr, Suzi & Sanchirico, James & Newell, Richard, 2002. "Fishing Quota Markets," Discussion Papers dp-02-20, Resources For the Future.
    2. Wilen, James E., 2000. "Renewable Resource Economists and Policy: What Differences Have We Made?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 306-327, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:otg:wpaper:1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Steffen Lippert).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.