IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/dapvj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public participation in China and the West

Author

Listed:
  • Gil, Olga

Abstract

This work shows differences in public participation in China and Western countries, conceptually and empirically. To do so, the different philosophical and public administration traditions are outlined. Main contributions are tables and dashboards that allow for general comparisons and to differentiate contexts in both political settings, and are useful for other settings. The tables included are: 1) Main features of context in China, 2) Deliberative democracy, 3) Main features of context in the west, 4) The Gil Dashboard, helping to outline the endogenous foundations for change both in China and the West.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil, Olga, 2019. "Public participation in China and the West," SocArXiv dapvj, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dapvj
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dapvj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6385e9bf723a111cba18c98f/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dapvj?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2016. "The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics (With Case Studies of Thailand, Bhutan and Yogyakarta)," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 69, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    2. Olga Gil & María E. Cortés-Cediel & Iván Cantador, 2019. "Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pages 19-34, January.
    3. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2019. "The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 523-560, March.
    4. Eliza Lee & Ian Thynne & Baogang He, 2011. "Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(2), pages 122-133, May.
    5. Shanshan Yang, 2008. "Public Participation In The Chinese Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia) System," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 91-113.
    6. Lin, Yanliu, 2018. "A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 800-809.
    7. Fishkin, James S. & He, Baogang & Luskin, Robert C. & Siu, Alice, 2010. "Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 435-448, April.
    8. Stephen Elstub, 2010. "The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 8(3), pages 291-307, September.
    9. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Tianguang & Su, Zheng, 2021. "When top-down meets bottom-up: Local officials and selective responsiveness within fiscal policymaking in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Ella M. Lebezova & Lyudmila A. Ovcharenko, 2022. "A model of citizens’ digital participation in the Smart Environment," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 62-85, October.
    3. Harri Raisio & Pirkko Vartiainen, 2015. "Accelerating the public’s learning curve on wicked policy issues: results from deliberative forums on euthanasia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 339-361, September.
    4. Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "The Normative Order of International Politics: Critique and Legitimacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 25-45.
    5. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    7. Igor Dunayev & Nataliia Gavkalova & Aleksander Kud, 2023. "Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(13 (124)), pages 46-56, August.
    8. Bingqian Zhang & Guochao Peng & Caihua Liu & Zuopeng Justin Zhang & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin, 2022. "Adaptation behaviour in using one-stop smart governance apps: an exploratory study between digital immigrants and digital natives," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1971-1991, December.
    9. Abby Lindsay, 2018. "Social learning as an adaptive measure to prepare for climate change impacts on water provision in Peru," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 477-487, December.
    10. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:54-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Yue Guo & Lei Zhou & Jidong Chen, 2023. "The persuasive role of the past: Policy feedback and citizens' acceptance of information communication technologies during the COVID‐19 pandemic in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 573-588, July.
    13. Kris Hartley, 2023. "Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance and Quality-of-Life in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 731-753, April.
    14. Hajli, Nick, 2015. "Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-191.
    15. Viktor Zinchenko & Mykhailo Boichenko, 2022. "Buddhist economics as a return to rational model of economic management," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 227-244.
    16. Karimikia, Hadi & Bradshaw, Robert & Singh, Harminder & Ojo, Adegboyega & Donnellan, Brian & Guerin, Michael, 2022. "An emergent taxonomy of boundary spanning in the smart city context – The case of smart Dublin," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Steven J. BALLA & Zhou LIAO, 2013. "Online Consultation and Citizen Feedback in Chinese Policymaking," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 42(3), pages 101-120.
    18. Juliani, Fernando & de Oliveira, Otávio José, 2016. "State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1033-1041.
    19. Ganesh Prasad Pandeya & Shree Krishna Shrestha, 2016. "Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 11(3), pages 276-304, December.
    20. Viktor Zinchenko & Mykhailo Boichenko, 2022. "Buddhist economics as a return to rational model of economic management," Working Papers hal-03760219, HAL.
    21. Mortenson, Michael J. & Vidgen, Richard, 2016. "A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1248-1259.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dapvj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.