IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ck7de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Generation Effects on Americans’ Symbolic Ideology and Attitudes Toward the Economic Role of Government

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson, Robert
  • Rainey, Carlisle

Abstract

Many existing reports and studies based on a single cross-section of survey data indicate that Millennials and Generation Z are more liberal than preceding generations. However, purely cross-sectional data are unable to differentiate between age effects, period effects, and generation or cohort effects. Pooling 23 General Social Surveys (GSS) cross-sections across the years 1983-2021, we apply contemporary age-period-cohort (APC) modeling techniques to differentiate these effects as they pertain to both symbolic ideology and operational economic ideology. We find greater support for age effects and period (i.e., survey year) effects than generation effects, calling into question the conventional wisdom on the liberalism of these recent generations. Our evidence is more consistent with an aging process in which Americans, regardless of generation, become more symbolically and economically conservative across their life course. Our results also reinforce doubts about the conventional, contemporary classification scheme for generations in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson, Robert & Rainey, Carlisle, 2023. "Generation Effects on Americans’ Symbolic Ideology and Attitudes Toward the Economic Role of Government," SocArXiv ck7de, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ck7de
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ck7de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/64ca7a939cbf0329dd1e472a/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ck7de?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Gelman & Ben Goodrich & Jonah Gabry & Aki Vehtari, 2019. "R-squared for Bayesian Regression Models," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 307-309, July.
    2. Norval D. Glenn, 1974. "Aging and Conservatism," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 415(1), pages 176-186, September.
    3. Grasso, Maria Teresa & Farrall, Stephen & Gray, Emily & Hay, Colin & Jennings, Will, 2019. "Thatcher’s Children, Blair’s Babies, Political Socialization and Trickle-down Value Change: An Age, Period and Cohort Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 17-36, January.
    4. Laura Stoker & M. Kent Jennings, 2008. "Of Time and the Development of Partisan Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 619-635, July.
    5. James Tilley, 2002. "Political generations and partisanship in the UK, 1964–1997," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(1), pages 121-135, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Franz Kotschy & Uwe Sunde, 2022. "Does Demography Determine Democratic Attitudes?," CESifo Working Paper Series 9535, CESifo.
    2. Anli Jiang & Zhengxu Wang & Tony Huiquan Zhang, 2022. "Radicalizing and Conservatizing: Ageing Effects on Political Trust in Asia, 2001–2016," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 665-681, July.
    3. Harkness, Caroline & Areal, Francisco J. & Semenov, Mikhail A. & Senapati, Nimai & Shield, Ian F. & Bishop, Jacob, 2023. "Towards stability of food production and farm income in a variable climate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    4. Jonas Dehning & Sebastian B. Mohr & Sebastian Contreras & Philipp Dönges & Emil N. Iftekhar & Oliver Schulz & Philip Bechtle & Viola Priesemann, 2023. "Impact of the Euro 2020 championship on the spread of COVID-19," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Sebastian Jungkunz & Paul Marx, 2021. "Income Changes Do Not Influence Political Participation: Evidence from Comparative Panel Data," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1129, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Adrian Rauchfleisch & Mike S Schäfer & Dario Siegen, 2021. "Beyond the ivory tower: Measuring and explaining academic engagement with journalists, politicians and industry representatives among Swiss professorss," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Connor M. French & Laura D. Bertola & Ana C. Carnaval & Evan P. Economo & Jamie M. Kass & David J. Lohman & Katharine A. Marske & Rudolf Meier & Isaac Overcast & Andrew J. Rominger & Phillip P. A. Sta, 2023. "Global determinants of insect mitochondrial genetic diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Blackaby, David H. & Drinkwater, Stephen & Robinson, Catherine, 2020. "Regional Variations in the Brexit Vote: Causes and Potential Consequences," IZA Discussion Papers 13579, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Carlos Iglesias Pastrana & Francisco Javier Navas González & Elena Ciani & María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, 2022. "Bayesian Linear Regression and Natural Logarithmic Correction for Digital Image-Based Extraction of Linear and Tridimensional Zoometrics in Dromedary Camels," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. repec:gig:joupla:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:3-38 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Tsendsuren Munkhdalai & Van Huy Pham & Jang-Eui Hong & Keun Ho Ryu & Nipon Theera-Umpon, 2022. "Neural Network-Augmented Locally Adaptive Linear Regression Model for Tabular Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Stephen Drinkwater & Colin Jennings, 2022. "The Brexit referendum and three types of regret," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 275-291, December.
    13. Muhammad Shafiullah & Usman Khalid & Sajid M. Chaudhry, 2022. "Do stock markets play a role in determining COVID‐19 economic stimulus? A cross‐country analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 386-408, February.
    14. Juan Carlos Huerta & Beatriz Cuartas, 2021. "Red to Purple? Changing Demographics and Party Change in Texas," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1330-1348, July.
    15. Rodriguez, Javier M., 2018. "Health disparities, politics, and the maintenance of the status quo: A new theory of inequality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 36-43.
    16. Kroh, Martin, 2014. "Growth trajectories in the strength of party identification: The legacy of autocratic regimes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33, pages 90-101.
    17. Jungkunz, Sebastian & Marx, Paul, 2021. "Income Changes Do Not Influence Political Participation: Evidence from Comparative Panel Data," IZA Discussion Papers 14198, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Wiertz, Dingeman & Rodon, Toni, 2021. "Frozen or malleable? Political ideology in the face of job loss and unemployment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Kuang, Yu Flora & Qin, Bo & Yang, Xing, 2023. "We are under attack: Terrorist attacks and director turnover," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    20. Henry E. Brady & Kay Lehman Schlozman & Sidney Verba, 2015. "Political Mobility and Political Reproduction from Generation to Generation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 657(1), pages 149-173, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ck7de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.