IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/j2pd3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Ecological System Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Coskun, Huseyin

Abstract

The system decomposition theory has recently been developed for the dynamic analysis of nonlinear compartmental systems. The application of this theory to the ecosystem analysis has also been introduced in a separate article. Based on this methodology, multiple new dynamic ecological system measures and indices of matrix, vector, and scalar types are systematically introduced in the present paper. These mathematical system analysis tools are quantitative ecological indicators that monitor the flow distribution and storage organization, quantify the direct, indirect, acyclic, cycling, and transfer (diact) effects and utilities of one compartment on another, identify the system efficiencies and stress, measure the compartmental exposures to system flows, determine the residence times and compartmental activity levels, and ascertain the system resilience and resistance in the case of disturbances. The proposed dynamic system measures and indices, thus, extract detailed information about ecosystems' characteristics, as well as their functions, properties, behaviors, and various other system attributes that are potentially hidden in and even obscured by data. A dynamic technique for the quantitative characterization and classification of main interspecific interactions and the determination of their strength within food webs is also developed based on the diact effect and utility indices. Moreover, major concepts and quantities in the current static network analyses are also extended to nonlinear dynamic settings and integrated with the proposed dynamic measures and indices in this unifying mathematical framework. Therefore, the proposed methodology enables a holistic view and analysis of ecological systems. We consider that the proposed methodology brings a novel complex system theory to the service of urgent and challenging environmental problems of the day and has the potential to lead the way to a more formalistic ecological science.

Suggested Citation

  • Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Dynamic Ecological System Measures," OSF Preprints j2pd3, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:j2pd3
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/j2pd3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5bfe013699e13c0019e78a35/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/j2pd3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fath, Brian D., 2007. "Network mutualism: Positive community-level relations in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 56-67.
    2. Ma, Q. & Kazanci, C., 2013. "Analysis of indirect effects within ecosystem models using pathway-based methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 238-245.
    3. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    4. Reid Bailey & Bert Bras & Janet K. Allen, 2004. "Applying Ecological Input‐Output Flow Analysis to Material Flows in Industrial Systems: Part II: Flow Metrics," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(1‐2), pages 69-91, January.
    5. Allen, Timothy & Giampietro, Mario, 2014. "Holons, creaons, genons, environs, in hierarchy theory: Where we have gone," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 31-41.
    6. Tuominen, Lindsey K. & Whipple, Stuart J. & Patten, Bernard C. & Karatas, Zekeriya Y. & Kazanci, Caner, 2014. "Contribution of throughflows to the ecological interpretation of integral network utility," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 187-201.
    7. Reid Bailey & Janet K. Allen & Bert Bras, 2004. "Applying Ecological Input‐Output Flow Analysis to Material Flows in Industrial Systems: Part I: Tracing Flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(1‐2), pages 45-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Static Ecological System Measures," OSF Preprints g4xzt, Center for Open Science.
    2. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Static Ecological System Analysis," OSF Preprints zqxc5, Center for Open Science.
    3. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    4. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Dynamic Ecological System Analysis," OSF Preprints 35xkb, Center for Open Science.
    5. Zhang, Yan & Yang, Zhifeng & Fath, Brian D. & Li, Shengsheng, 2010. "Ecological network analysis of an urban energy metabolic system: Model development, and a case study of four Chinese cities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1865-1879.
    6. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Ecological network analysis of an industrial symbiosis system: A case study of the Shandong Lubei eco-industrial park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 174-184.
    7. Zhang, Yan & Yang, Zhifeng & Yu, Xiangyi, 2009. "Ecological network and emergy analysis of urban metabolic systems: Model development, and a case study of four Chinese cities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1431-1442.
    8. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "The cardinal hypotheses of Holoecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 63-111.
    9. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Systems ecology and environmentalism: Getting the science right. Part II: The Janus Enigma Hypothesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 101-138.
    10. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson & Good, Jason, 2021. "Us before me: A group level approach to the circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Lu Liu & Jinhua Li & Zhibin Jia & Jing Liu, 2022. "Industrial metabolism analysis of a Chinese wine industry chain based on material flow and input–output analyses," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 448-461, April.
    12. Shyamal Gondkar & Sivakumar Sreeramagiri & Edwin Zondervan, 2012. "Methodology for Assessment and Optimization of Industrial Eco-Systems," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2014. "Analysis of the energy metabolism of urban socioeconomic sectors and the associated carbon footprints: Model development and a case study for Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 540-551.
    14. Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga & Nils Thonemann, 2021. "Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment to Analyze Environmental Impacts of the Medical Remanufacturing of Electrophysiology Catheters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Hashimoto, Seiji & Daigo, Ichiro & Eckelman, Matthew & Reck, Barbara, 2010. "Measuring the status of stainless steel use in the Japanese socio-economic system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 737-743.
    16. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson & Givry, Philippe & Canning, Louise & Franklin-Johnson, Elizabeth, 2018. "Longevity and Circularity as Indicators of Eco-Efficient Resource Use in the Circular Economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 297-306.
    17. Bailey, Reid & Bras, Bert & Allen, Janet K., 2008. "Measuring material cycling in industrial systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 643-652.
    18. Yazan, Devrim Murat, 2016. "Constructing joint production chains: An enterprise input-output approach for alternative energy use," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-52.
    19. Zhang, Yan & Lu, Hanjing & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei, 2016. "Modelling urban nitrogen metabolic processes based on ecological network analysis: A case of study in Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 29-38.
    20. He, He & Reynolds, Christian John & Li, Linyang & Boland, John, 2019. "Assessing net energy consumption of Australian economy from 2004–05 to 2014–15: Environmentally-extended input-output analysis, structural decomposition analysis, and linkage analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 766-777.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:j2pd3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.