IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/ceb2z.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

AS-AD model as a stock-flow consistent model

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Minseong

Abstract

This paper casts the AS-AD model as a decomposition of a stock-flow consistent (SFC) model with price-setting firms and output stock-flow norms into the price formation part (AS) and the rest (AD) of the economy. The AD curve is understood as possible output level solutions (Y) of the model for each given price level. The AS curve maps out a pricing strategy for each expected output demand. Where AS and AD curves intersect, stock-flow norms (targets) are exactly satisfied. The AS curve returns the price level from expected demand, and the AD curve determines the actual output level from the price level. Together, the AS-AD model gives us long-run analysis, having assumed equilibrium convergence. The SFC view of the AS-AD model frees us from profitability criticisms of AD schedule and affords the model of disequilibrium analysis that is free of inconsistencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Minseong, 2022. "AS-AD model as a stock-flow consistent model," OSF Preprints ceb2z, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ceb2z
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ceb2z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/631be3db09a8522f04d9f184/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ceb2z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Palley, 1998. "Walras' Law and Keynesian Macroeconomics," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 330-340, September.
    2. Eugenio Caverzasi & Antoine Godin, 2015. "Post-Keynesian stock-flow-consistent modelling: a survey," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(1), pages 157-187.
    3. Ingo Barens, 1997. "What Went Wrong with IS-LM/AS-AD Analysis--And Why," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 89-99, Winter.
    4. Barro, Robert J & Grossman, Herschel I, 1971. "A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 82-93, March.
    5. Michalis Nikiforos & Gennaro Zezza, 2017. "Stock-flow Consistent Macroeconomic Models: A Survey," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_891, Levy Economics Institute.
    6. Palley, Thomas I, 1998. "Walras' Law and Keynesian Macroeconomics," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 330-340, September.
    7. Thomas I. Palley, 1997. "Keynesian Theory and AS/AD Analysis," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 23(4), pages 459-468, Fall.
    8. Chirco, Alessandra & Colombo, Caterina, 1996. "The AD-AS Model and Its Solutions: Some New Results in a Disequilibrium Perspective," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(67), pages 263-281, December.
    9. Michalis Nikiforos & Gennaro Zezza, 2017. "Stock†Flow Consistent Macroeconomic Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1204-1239, December.
    10. David Colander, 1995. "The Stories We Tell: A Reconsideration of AS/AD Analysis," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 169-188, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richters, Oliver, 2021. "Modeling the out-of-equilibrium dynamics of bounded rationality and economic constraints," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 846-866.
    2. Marc Lavoie & Severin Reissl, 2019. "Further insights on endogenous money and the liquidity preference theory of interest," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 503-526, October.
    3. Jacques, Pierre & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Yilmaz, Devrim & Jeanmart, Hervé & Godin, Antoine, 2023. "Assessing the economic consequences of an energy transition through a biophysical stock-flow consistent model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Eduardo Fernández-Huerga & Ana Pardo & Ana Salvador, 2023. "Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 413-443, July.
    5. Emilio Carnevali, 2021. "Price mechanism and endogenous productivity in an open economy stock‐flow consistent model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 22-56, February.
    6. Sercin Sahin, 2021. "Consumer confidence, consumption, and macroeconomic fluctuations: A systemic stock‐flow consistent model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 868-904, November.
    7. Christos Pierros, 2021. "Assessing the internal devaluation policy implemented in Greece in an empirical stock‐flow consistent model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 905-943, November.
    8. Eugenio Caverzasi & Alberto Russo, 2018. "Toward a new microfounded macroeconomics in the wake of the crisis," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 999-1014.
    9. Severin Reissl, 2021. "Heterogeneous expectations, forecasting behaviour and policy experiments in a hybrid Agent-based Stock-flow-consistent model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 251-299, January.
    10. Hafner, Sarah & Anger-Kraavi, Annela & Monasterolo, Irene & Jones, Aled, 2020. "Emergence of New Economics Energy Transition Models: A Review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Ítalo Pedrosa & Dany Lang, 2018. "Heterogeneity, distribution and financial fragility of non-financial firms: an agent-based stock-flow consistent (AB-SFC) model," Working Papers hal-01937186, HAL.
    12. Yannis Dafermos & Maria Nikolaidi, 2019. "Fiscal policy and ecological sustainability," FMM Working Paper 52-2019, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    13. Naqvi, Asjad & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2018. "Directed Technological Change in a Post-Keynesian Ecological Macromodel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 168-188.
    14. Francesco Zezza & Gennaro Zezza, 2023. "A prototype regional stock‐flow consistent model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 266-287, May.
    15. Li, Boyao, 2022. "The macroeconomic effects of Basel III regulations with endogenous credit and money creation," MPRA Paper 113873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Harald Badinger & Ingrid Kubin, 2008. "As‐Ad Revisited: Overshooting Adjustment Dynamics Under Naïve Expectations," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 574-593, November.
    17. Oliver Richters & Erhard Glötzl, 2020. "Modeling economic forces, power relations, and stock-flow consistency: a general constrained dynamics approach," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 281-297, April.
    18. Malcolm Sawyer, 2020. "The past, present and future of evolutionary macroeconomics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 37-54, May.
    19. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2019. "Fiscal policy and ecological sustainability: a post-Keynesian perspective," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37777, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    20. Erhard Glötzl & Florentin Glötzl & Oliver Richters, 2019. "From constrained optimization to constrained dynamics: extending analogies between economics and mechanics," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 14(3), pages 623-642, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ceb2z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.