IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30370.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences of Ability Tracking: Evidence from Texas Public Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Antonovics
  • Sandra E. Black
  • Julie Berry Cullen
  • Akiva Yonah Meiselman

Abstract

Little is known about the pervasiveness or determinants of within-school ability tracking in the US. To fill this gap, we use detailed administrative data to estimate the extent of tracking in Texas public schools for grades 4 through 8 over the years 2011-2019. Strikingly, we find that ability tracking across classes within schools overwhelms sorting by ability across districts and schools, as well as sorting by race/ethnicity or economic disadvantage. We also examine how schools operationalize tracking as well as the local characteristics that predict tracking. Finally, we explore how exposure to tracking (and the bundle of associated practices) relates to achievement gains, finding that, on average, tracking increases inequality by slightly improving test scores of higher-achieving students without harming those of lower-achieving students.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Antonovics & Sandra E. Black & Julie Berry Cullen & Akiva Yonah Meiselman, 2022. "Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences of Ability Tracking: Evidence from Texas Public Schools," NBER Working Papers 30370, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30370
    Note: ED PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30370.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.