We theoretically and experimentally study a zero sum betting market: the Pelota betting system, but with commonly known objective probabilities and without commissions. We know that risk-averse expected utility maximizers with identical objective probabilities cannot agree on a bet. Nevertheless, the rank dependent expected utility model allows us to explain the existence of such betting markets even assuming individuals are all identical even in utilities. We focus on behaviour in a given period in a Pelota betting market and we aim to explain the volume of bets assuming that all individuals are equal and their marginal utility on wealth is decreasing. We do this in two stages. First, subjects are asked to take betting decisions and the power utility function and probability weighting function are estimated. Once the underlying utility and probability weighting function are known, in a second stage subjects interact in a betting market and we test whether the volume of bets differs from proposed theoretical predictions.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Length: pages Date of creation: 2006 Date of revision: Publication status: Published in Handle: RePEc:nav:ecupna:0604
Contact details of provider: Postal: Campus de Arrosadía - 31006 Pamplona (Spain) Phone: 34 948 169340 Fax: 34 948 169 721 Web page: http://www.econ.unavarra.es
Order Information: Postal: Papers are not sent in a centralized mode. You can download them with ftp, or contact the authors.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Javier Puértolas).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: