This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

What Motivates Returns Policies?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Charles E. Hyde
Abstract

We examine two different models of manufacturer-retailer successive monopoly with retail demand uncertainty. In the first, both manufacturer and retailer are symmetrically uninformed about demand. Equilibrium exists if and only if the marginal costs of production and storage are sufficiently high, in which case the manufacturer offers a full-returns policy. Together with previous results, this shows that both the structure of the uncertainty and the timing of its resolution are critical factors affecting the scope for returns policies. In the second model, the manufacturer knows demand while the retailer does not. A full-returns policy is never offered in this case. Moreover, if any partial-returns policy is offered, it does not serve to signal the level of demand.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au/SITE/research/workingpapers/wp00_01/821.pdf
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by The University of Melbourne in its series Department of Economics - Working Papers Series with number 821.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:821

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 5th Floor, Economics and Commerce Building, Victoria, 3010, Australia
Phone: +61 3 8344 5289
Fax: +61 3 8344 6899
Email:
Web page: http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Colemann Leong).

Related research
Keywords: returns policies; demand uncertainty; pricing; successive monopoly;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Marvel, Howard P & Peck, James, 1995. "Demand Uncertainty and Returns Policies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 36(3), pages 691-714, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Butz, David A, 1997. "Vertical Price Controls with Uncertain Demand," Journal of Law & Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 433-59, October.
  3. Kandel, Eugene, 1996. "The Right to Return," Journal of Law & Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(1), pages 329-56, April.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.