This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Additive utility in prospect theory Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Han Bleichrodt
Ulrich Schmidt
Horst Zank
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by Economics, The University of Manchester in its series The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series with number
0811.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2008Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:man:sespap:0811Contact details of provider: Postal: Manchester M13 9PL Phone: (0)161 275 4868 Fax: (0)161 275 4812 Web page: http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/disciplines/economics/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Marianne Sensier).
Keywords: This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Kobberling, Veronika & Wakker, Peter P., 2005.
"An index of loss aversion ,"
Journal of Economic Theory ,
Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 119-131, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Abdellaoui, Mohammed & Barrios, Carolina & Wakker, Peter P., 2007.
"Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory ,"
Journal of Econometrics ,
Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 356-378, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992.
" Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
Schunk, Daniel & Betsch, Cornelia, 2006.
"Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes ,"
Journal of Economic Psychology ,
Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 386-401, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979.
"Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk ,"
Econometrica ,
Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-91, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Wakker, Peter & Tversky, Amos, 1993.
" An Axiomatization of Cumulative Prospect Theory ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 147-75, October.
Nathalie Etchart-Vincent, 2004.
"Is Probability Weighting Sensitive to the Magnitude of Consequences? An Experimental Investigation on Losses ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 217-235, 05.
[Downloadable!]
Sarin, Rakesh & Wakker, Peter P, 1998.
"Dynamic Choice and NonExpected Utility ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 87-119, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Bateman, Ian J, et al, 1997.
"A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 112(2), pages 479-505, May.
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? LogEc provides statistical analysis about downloads from this service (and others).
This page was last updated on 2009-12-3.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .