IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luc/wpaper/23-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women Directors and Cost Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Litina

    (University of Macedonia)

  • Luca J. Uberti

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Skerdilajda Zanaj

    (DEM, Université du Luxembourg)

Abstract

In an era where gender norms vary widely and quite frequently hint to gender inequality in the labor market, previous studies have shown that higher gender diversity is associated with better economic outcomes. Using a novel dataset that provides granular data at the firm level, we test this hypothesis in the context of gold mining companies. We concentrate on a relatively overlooked aspect, namely cost efficiency, and study whether a larger number of women directors is associated with more efficient use of a company’s resources. We use a stochastic frontier methodology to estimate the cost-efficiency of gold mines for a representative sample of global mining companies. Using fixed-effects and instrumental-variable regressions, we find that an increase in female representation on the parent company’s board translates into significant efficiency gains for the mining operations controlled by the parent company. Specifically, a one standard-deviation increase in the share of female directors increases cost-efficiency by 12 percent of a standard deviation of our main efficiency index. This finding is robust to using alternative instruments for female representation, alternative stochastic-frontier methodologies, and different specifications of the main estimating equation. Interestingly, the efficiency gains induced by female directors do not necessarily improve the overall performance of the company as measured by accounting profitability. Yet, cost efficiency is associated with higher cost-sustainability and long-term viability of a firm, thereby rendering it more resilient. This hints that the underlying mechanism is consistent with evidence that suggests that women directors exert a higher monitoring and audit effort than their male counterparts. Our results provide additional evidence of a distinctly female style in corporate leadership and shed light to different aspects of a firm’s productivity. Understanding differences in styles of leadership, allows policy makers to implement more inclusive policies in the labor market and firms to endorse diversity in leadership. This ultimately can lead to more inclusive norms in the labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Litina & Luca J. Uberti & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2023. "Women Directors and Cost Efficiency," DEM Discussion Paper Series 23-18, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:23-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10993/59426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKinnon, James G. & Nielsen, Morten Ørregaard & Webb, Matthew D., 2023. "Cluster-robust inference: A guide to empirical practice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 272-299.
    2. Daehyun Kim & Laura T. Starks, 2016. "Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Do Women Contribute Unique Skills?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 267-271, May.
    3. M. Cecilia Bustamante & Laurent Frésard, 2021. "Does Firm Investment Respond to Peers’ Investment?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4703-4724, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Owen, Ann L. & Temesvary, Judit, 2018. "The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 50-63.
    2. Monica Violeta Achim & Viorela-Ligia Văidean & Andrada-Ioana Sabău Popa & Lavinia-Ioana Safta, 2022. "The impact of corporate governance on the digitalization process: empirical evidence for the Romanian companies," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 313-340, December.
    3. Todd Morris & Benoit Dostie, 2023. "Graying and staying on the job: The welfare implications of employment protection for older workers," Cahiers de recherche / Working Papers 15, Institut sur la retraite et l'épargne / Retirement and Savings Institute.
    4. Rik Chakraborti & Gavin Roberts, 2023. "How price-gouging regulation undermined COVID-19 mitigation: county-level evidence of unintended consequences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 51-83, July.
    5. Ararat, Melsa & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Female directors, board committees, and firm performance: Time-series evidence from Turkey," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    6. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster‐robust inference," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, August.
    7. Marina Gertsberg & Johanna Mollerstrom & Michaela Pagel, 2021. "Gender Quotas and Support for Women in Board Elections," NBER Working Papers 28463, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Prado, Melissa & Evans, Richard B. & Zambrana, Rafael, 2020. "Identity, Diversity, and Team Performance: Evidence from U.S. Mutual Funds," CEPR Discussion Papers 14305, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Dodd, Olga & Frijns, Bart & Garel, Alexandre, 2022. "Cultural diversity among directors and corporate social responsibility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regressions with Weak and Few Clusters," Papers 2108.13707, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    11. Aggarwal, Raj & Jindal, Varun & Seth, Rama, 2019. "Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    12. Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Wei-Kang Wang & Wen-Min Lu & Yun-Jung Chen, 2021. "Do female directors will have impact on corporate performance?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 611-631, April.
    13. Leonardo Gambacorta & Alessio Reghezza & Martina Spaggiari & Livia Pancotto, 2022. "Gender diversity in bank boardrooms and green lending: evidence from euro area credit register data," BIS Working Papers 1044, Bank for International Settlements.
    14. Jung Ho Choi & Joseph Pacelli & Kristina M. Rennekamp & Sorabh Tomar, 2023. "Do Jobseekers Value Diversity Information? Evidence from a Field Experiment and Human Capital Disclosures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 695-735, June.
    15. Yuya Sasaki & Yulong Wang, 2022. "Non-Robustness of the Cluster-Robust Inference: with a Proposal of a New Robust Method," Papers 2210.16991, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    16. Jeong Jin Yu & Guy Madison, 2021. "Gender quotas and company financial performance: A systematic review," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 377-390, October.
    17. Adams, Renée B. & Akyol, Ali C. & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2018. "Director skill sets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 641-662.
    18. Baghdadi, Ghasan A. & Safiullah, Md & Heyden, Mariano L.M., 2023. "Do gender diverse boards enhance managerial ability?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Olga Dodd & Bart Frijns & Robin Kaiji Gong & Shushu Liao, 2024. "Board cultural diversity and firm performance under competitive pressures," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(1), pages 89-111, February.
    20. Nguyen, Thi Hong Hanh & Ntim, Collins G. & Malagila, John K., 2020. "Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender; Boards of directors; Cost efficiency; Stochastic Frontier Analysis; Mining.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:23-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Legrand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crcrplu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.