This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Differing Prospects For Women and Men: Young Old-Age, Old Old-Age, and Elder Care

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Lois B. Shaw
Abstract

Although elderly men and women share many of the same problems as they age, their lives are likely to follow different courses. Women are more likely than men to live into old old-age and are more likely to spend part of their young old-age caring for husbands or parents. By providing this unpaid care women might enter retirement earlier, rather than prolonging their working lives. Because they live longer, but are less likely than men to live with someone who will care for them, women are also more likely than men to require paid care either at home or in a nursing home. Proposals to reduce government spending on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will thus have different implications for women and men. This paper evaluates changes in these programs, and describes alternative and innovative ways of providing and paying for eldercare in other countries as well as in the United States.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.levy.org/pubs/wp_464.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Levy Economics Institute, The in its series Economics Working Paper Archive with number wp_464.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jul 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:lev:wrkpap:wp_464

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.levy.org

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Barbara Murphy).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Richard w. Johnson & Cori Uccello, 2005. "Is Private Long-Term Care Insurance the Answer?," Issues in Brief ib29, Center for Retirement Research. [Downloadable!]
  2. Richard W. Johnson & Cori E. Uccello, 2005. "Is Private Long-Term Care Insurance the Answer?," Issues in Brief ib2005-29, Center for Retirement Research, revised Mar 2005. [Downloadable!]
  3. Susan Eaton, 2005. "Eldercare in the United States: Inadequate, Inequitable, but Not a Lost Cause," Feminist Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 37-51, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Van Houtven, Courtney Harold & Norton, Edward C., 2004. "Informal care and health care use of older adults," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1159-1180, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Martha MacDonald & Shelley Phipps & Lynn Lethbridge, 2005. "Taking Its Toll: The Influence of Paid and Unpaid Work on Women's Well-Being," Feminist Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 63-94, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All top Economics journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-3.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.