Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Effects of Large-Scale Research Funding Programs:A Japanese Case Study

Contents:

Author Info

  • Takanori Ida
  • Naomi Fukuzawa
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This study investigates the effects of large-scale research funding from the Japanese government on the research outcomes of university researchers. To evaluate the effects, we use the difference-in-differences estimator and measure research outcomes in terms of number of papers and citation counts per paper. Our analysis shows that the funding program led to an increase in the number of papers in some fields and an increase in the citation counts in the other fields. A comparison of our estimation results with assessment data obtained from peer reviews showed important differences. Since the characteristics of research vary according to the field, bibliometrics analysis should be used along with the peer review method for a more accurate analysis of research impact.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/projectcenter/Paper/e-11-012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University in its series Discussion papers with number e-11-012.

    as in new window
    Length: 33 pages
    Date of creation: Feb 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:kue:dpaper:e-11-012

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501
    Phone: (075)753-3400
    Fax: (075)753-3492
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/projectcenter/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Research assessment; Difference-in-differences; Government grants; University research; Bibliometrics; Peer review;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kue:dpaper:e-11-012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graduate School of Economics Project Center).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.