Overconfidence is a Social Signaling Bias
AbstractEvidence from psychology and economics indicates that many individuals overestimate their ability, both absolutely and relatively. We test three different theories about observed relative overconfidence. The first theory notes that simple statistical comparisons (for example, whether the fraction of individuals rating own skill above the median value is larger than half) are compatible (BenoÃ®t and Dubra, 2007) with a Bayesian model of updating from a common prior and truthful statements. We show that such model imposes testable restrictions on relative ability judgments, and we test the restrictions. Data on 1,016 individuals' relative ability judgments about two cognitive tests rejects the Bayesian model. The second theory suggests that self-image concerns asymmetrically affect the choice to get new information about oneâs abilities, and this asymmetry produces overconfidence (Kőszegi, 2006; Weinberg, 2006). We test an important specific prediction of these models: individuals with a higher belief will be less likely to search for further information about their skill, because this information might make this belief worse. Our data also reject this prediction. The third theory is that overconfidence is induced by the desire to send positive signals to others about oneâs own skill; this suggests either a bias in judgment, strategic lying, or both. We provide evidence that personality traits strongly affect relative ability judgments in a pattern that is consistent with this third theory. Our results together suggest that overconfidence in statements is most likely to be induced by social concerns than by either of the other two factors.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in its series IZA Discussion Papers with number 4840.
Length: 43 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Phone: +49 228 3894 223
Fax: +49 228 3894 180
Web page: http://www.iza.org
Postal: IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics; Underlying Principles
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search, Learning, and Information
- C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-04-04 (All new papers)
- NEP-CBE-2010-04-04 (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EVO-2010-04-04 (Evolutionary Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2010-04-04 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HPE-2010-04-04 (History & Philosophy of Economics)
- NEP-NEU-2010-04-04 (Neuroeconomics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Proto, Eugenio & Sgroi, Daniel, 2012.
"Self-Centered Beliefs : An Empirical Approach,"
The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), University of Warwick, Department of Economics
978, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Proto, Eugenio & Sgroi, Daniel, 2012. "Self Centred Beliefs: An Empircal Approach," CAGE Online Working Paper Series, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) 75, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Benoît, Jean-Pierre & Dubra, Juan & Moore, Don, 2009.
"Does the Better-Than-Average Effect Show That People Are Overconfident?: Two Experiments,"
44956, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Mar 2013.
- Jean-Pierre Benoit & Juan Dubra & Don Moore, 2013. "Does the better –than- average effect show that people are Overconfident?: two experiments," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo. 1301, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
- Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán-González & Stephen Rassenti, 2011. "Real Effort, Real Leisure and Real-time Supervision: Incentives and Peer Pressure in Virtual Organizations," Working Papers, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute 11-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Isabelle Vialle & Luis Santos-Pinto & Jean-Louis Rullière, 2011.
"Self-Confidence and Teamwork : An Experimental Test,"
Working Papers, Groupe d'Analyse et de ThÃ©orie Economique (GATE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), UniversitÃ© Lyon 2, Ecole Normale SupÃ©rieure
1126, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique (GATE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Université Lyon 2, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
- Jean-Louis Rullière & Luis Santos Pinto & Isabelle Vialle, 2011. "Self-Confidence and Teamwork : An Experimental Test," Post-Print, HAL halshs-00632091, HAL.
- Juan Dubra & Jean-Pierre Benoit, 2011.
Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo.
1106, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
- Proto, Eugenio; Sgroi, Daniel, 2011.
"False Consensus in Economic Agents,"
CAGE Online Working Paper Series, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)
55, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Proto, Eugenio & Sgroi, Daniel, 2011. "False Consensus in Economic Agents," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), University of Warwick, Department of Economics 968, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Grossman, Zachary & Owens, David, 2012.
"An unlucky feeling: Overconfidence and noisy feedback,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier,
Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 510-524.
- Grossman, Zachary & Owens, David, 2010. "An Unlucky Feeling: Overconfidence and Noisy Feedback," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt13r2f3gt, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
- Engelmann, Dirk & Strobel, Martin, 2012. "Deconstruction and reconstruction of an anomaly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 678-689.
- Hendrik van Broekhuizen & Dieter von Fintel, 2010. "Who Responds to Voluntary Cognitive Tests in Household Surveys? The Role of Labour Market Status, Respondent Confidence, Motivation and a Culture of Learning in South Africa," Working Papers 27/2010, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Fallak).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.