IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc88469.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mapping and Analysing Prospective Technologies for Learning - Results from a Consultation with European Stakeholders and Roadmaps for Policy Action

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Aceto

    (MENON Network)

  • Spiros Borotis

    (MENON Network)

  • Jim Devine

    (DEVINE Policy|Projects|Innovation (and former President, IADT))

  • Thomas Fischer

    (MENON Network)

Abstract

EU policies call for the strengthening of Europes innovative capacity and it is considered that the modernisation of Education and Training systems and technologies for learning will be a key enabler of educational innovation and change. This report brings evidence to the debate about the technologies that are expected to play a decisive role in shaping future learning strategies in the short to medium term (5-10 years from now) in three main learning domains: formal education and training; work-place and work-related learning; re-skilling and up-skilling strategies in a lifelong-learning continuum. This is the final report of the study Mapping and analysing prospective technologies for learning (MATEL)' carried out by the MENON Network EEIG on behalf of the European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. The report synthesises the main messages gathered from the three phases of the study: online consultation, state-of-the-art analysis and a roadmapping workshop. Eight technology clusters and a set of related key technologies that can enable learning innovation and educational change were identified. A number of these technologies were analysed to highlight their current and potential use in education, the relevant market trends and ongoing policy initiatives. Three roadmaps, one for each learning domain, were developed. These identified long-term goals and specific objectives for educational change, which in turn led to recommendations on the immediate strategies and actions to be undertaken by policy and decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Aceto & Spiros Borotis & Jim Devine & Thomas Fischer, 2014. "Mapping and Analysing Prospective Technologies for Learning - Results from a Consultation with European Stakeholders and Roadmaps for Policy Action," JRC Research Reports JRC88469, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc88469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC88469
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsti Maria Ala-Mutka & Magherita Bacigalupo & Stefano Kluzer & Corina Pascu & Yves Punie & Christine Redecker, 2009. "Learning2.0. The Impact of Web2.0 Innovation on Education and Training in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC50704, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romina Cachia & Anusca Ferrari, 2010. "Creativity in Schools: A Survey of Teachers in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC59232, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Panagiotis Kampylis & Stefania Bocconi & Yves Punie, 2012. "Towards a Mapping Framework of ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning," JRC Research Reports JRC72277, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Prospective technologies for learning; Formal education and training; work-place and work-related learning; Re-skilling and up-skilling strategies in lifelong-learning continuum; Europe 2020 Strategy; educational change; Innovation & Creativity in Education and Training; ICT-enabled innovation for learning; roadmapping;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc88469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.