IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc113434.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Squaring the circle: lessons from the role-playing exercises on S3 regional and multi-level governance

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabetta Marinelli

    (European Commission – JRC)

  • Yannis Tolias

    (Innovatia Systems)

  • Federica Bertamino

    (Agenzia della Coesione Territoriale)

  • Michalis Metaxas

    (Innovatia Systems)

  • Jennifer Grisorio

    (ARTI Puglia)

Abstract

Whilst there is widespread agreement on the importance of developing an appropriate governance structure for S3, there is little empirical evidence on the challenges this entails. The JRC, as part of its activities of Targeted Support, has developed a working group to address these issues. The working group operated in the first half of 2018, built upon an extensive background research as well as two role-playing exercises. The latter aimed at understanding and addressing key policy challenges, by enacting realistic policy scenarios. The paper explores both policy and methodological questions. As for the former, the paper investigates the main bottlenecks inhibiting the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder policy development, identifying the administrative and technical needs of those in charge of S3 governance. As for the latter, the paper provides an opportunity to reflect on role-playing as a tool for policy analysis in the context of Cohesion policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabetta Marinelli & Yannis Tolias & Federica Bertamino & Michalis Metaxas & Jennifer Grisorio, 2018. "Squaring the circle: lessons from the role-playing exercises on S3 regional and multi-level governance," JRC Research Reports JRC113434, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc113434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC113434
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geurts, Jac. L. A. & Joldersma, Cisca, 2001. "Methodology for participatory policy analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 300-310, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadie McEvoy & Frans H. M. van de Ven & Reinder Brolsma & Jill H. Slinger, 2019. "Evaluating a Planning Support System’s Use and Effects in Urban Adaptation: An Exploratory Case Study from Berlin, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Stigson, Peter & Dotzauer, Erik & Yan, Jinyue, 2009. "Improving policy making through government-industry policy learning: The case of a novel Swedish policy framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 399-406, April.
    3. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    4. Jose-Luis Molina & Jose García-Aróstegui & John Bromley & Jose Benavente, 2011. "Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(13), pages 3343-3370, October.
    5. Steven J. Tepper & Stephanie Hinton, 2003. "The Measure of Meetings: Forums, Deliberation, and Cultural Policy," Working Papers 39, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    6. Frank van Kouwen & Carel Dieperink & Paul P. Schot & Martin J. Wassen, 2007. "Interactive Problem Structuring with ICZM Stakeholders," Working Papers 2007.52, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Walczak, Dariusz & Rutkowska, Aleksandra, 2017. "Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 706-714.
    8. Tommi Gustafsson & Ahti Salo & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2003. "Multicriteria methods for technology foresight," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2-3), pages 235-255.
    9. Greiner, R, 2004. "Systems framework for regional-scale integrated modelling and assessment," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-51.
    10. Inge Bleijenbergh & Hubert Korzilius & Piet Verschuren, 2011. "Methodological criteria for the internal validity and utility of practice oriented research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 145-156, January.
    11. Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris & Xidonas, Panos & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2017. "Multicriteria decision support in local energy planning: An evaluation of alternative scenarios for the Sustainable Energy Action Plan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-16.
    12. van Kouwen, Frank & Dieperink, Carel & Schot, Paul P. & Wassen, Martin J., 2007. "Interactive Problem Structuring with ICZM Stakeholders," Natural Resources Management Working Papers 9555, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    13. Georges Comair & Daene McKinney & David Maidment & Gonzalo Espinoza & Harish Sangiredy & Abbas Fayad & Fernando Salas, 2014. "Hydrology of the Jordan River Basin: A GIS-Based System to Better Guide Water Resources Management and Decision Making," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(4), pages 933-946, March.
    14. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons, 2008. "Doing Policy In The Lab! Options For The Future Use Of Model-Based Policy Analysis For Complex Decision-Making," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6588, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Wegener, Stefan, 2005. "Interaktive computergestützte Modellierung für die Gestaltung von Agrarumweltprogrammen – Ein Programmierungsansatz zur Entscheidungsunterstützung in Sachsen-Anhalt," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40, March.
    16. Anna Scolobig & Johan Lilliestam, 2016. "Comparing Approaches for the Integration of Stakeholder Perspectives in Environmental Decision Making," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Bonjun Koo & Jong-Il Na & Throstur Thorsteinsson & Ana Maria Cruz, 2020. "Participatory Approach to Gap Analysis between Policy and Practice Regarding Air Pollution in Ger Areas of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P., 2018. "Community Operational Research and Citizen Science: Two icons in need of each other?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1111-1124.
    19. Igor Mayer & Martin de Jong, 2004. "Combining GDSS and Gaming for Decision Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 223-241, May.
    20. repec:pri:cpanda:wp28%20-%20tepper is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Kiryluk-Dryjska, Ewa, 2008. "Zastosowanie Modelu Optymalizacyjnego Do Alokacji Środków Strukturalnych," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(141).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc113434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.