This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Globalization's challenge to pension reform in Western Europe

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
M. Dudek Carolyn () (Department of Political Science, Hofstra University, New York, USA)
Pieter Omtzigt () (Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Italy)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The following suggests that demographic changes and the creation of a single currency in Europe has compelled greater EU intervention in pension reform. Although, traditionally pension reform has remained the domain of the domestic realm, increased European integration has necessitated lifting the issue of pension reform to the EU level. Capital flows among Eu member states, the economic dependence among members of EMU and the unique institutional structure of the EU has facilitated increased attention at the EU level regarding pension reform. Politically, the EU presents a unique condition since national governments can use Brussels as a scapegoat to implement contested policies such as pension reform and accountability at the EU level is distinct from democratic configurations within member states also facilitating change within a highly contested policy area. Economically, the almost complete economic integration after the introduction of the Euro, means that countries are ever more dependent on policy choices in other Member States: no lOnger are countries able to keep all the benefits of prefunding, like increased investment, within their own borders. This study concludes that both the political and economic importance of the EU and its uniqueness may lead to an important role of Brussels in the context of pension reform.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://eco.uninsubria.it/dipeco/Quaderni/files/QF2001_10.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Insubria in its series Economics and Quantitative Methods with number qf0107.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: May 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf0107

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via Ravasi 2-21100 Varese
Web page: http://eco.uninsubria.it/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Segreteria Dipartimento).

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Burley, Anne-Marie & Mattli, Walter, 1993. "Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(01), pages 41-76, December. [Downloadable!]
  2. Thomas Cooley & Jorge Soares, 1999. "Privatizing Social Security," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 2(3), pages 731-755, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-31.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.