IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2009_009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Product Development Decisions: An empirical approach to Krishnan and Ulrich

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper investigates whether decisions considered as common in new product development literature are also empirically valid. The decisions made in the different phases constituting new product development, is a topic that has extensively been studied in the literature. Our study is based on Krishnan and Ulrich’s (2001) literature review. Despite the relevance of their theoretical contribution, their work has not been empirically proven yet. Therewith, we aim to link the theoretical and empirical fields in the context of new product development and product innovation management. The research is grounded on innovative companies in the Valencian Region (Spain). Using the statistical tool of factor analysis, we test if the groups of decisions identified by Krishnan and Ulrich can be confirmed in our empirical sample. Our results lead to three main conclusions. The data show that Krishnan and Ulrich’s questions are indeed taken into account during new product development process. In addition, our results are in line with the features already identified in the Valencian innovation system. However, the way the questions are grouped according to the theory and the empirics differ substantially.

Suggested Citation

  • Zabala, Jon Mikel & Hannemann, Tina, 2009. "Product Development Decisions: An empirical approach to Krishnan and Ulrich," Papers in Innovation Studies 2009/9, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2009_009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/200909_Zabala_Hanneman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buyukozkan, G.Gulcin & Feyzioglu, Orhan, 2004. "A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 27-45, July.
    2. Marta Riba Vilanova & Loet Leydesdorff, 2001. "Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(2), pages 215-240, February.
    3. Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Fernando Jiménez-Sáez & Elena Castro-Martínez & Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia, 2007. "What indicators do (or do not) tell us about Regional Innovation Systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(1), pages 85-106, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU – updated version," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Li, Yin & Arora, Sanjay & Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2018. "Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 3-14.
    4. Nehal Elshaboury & Tarek Attia & Mohamed Marzouk, 2020. "Comparison of Several Aggregation Techniques for Deriving Analytic Network Process Weights," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4901-4919, December.
    5. Barbero, Javier & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Zofío, José L., 2021. "Is more always better? On the relevance of decreasing returns to scale on innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Bresciani, Stefano & Puertas, Rosa & Ferraris, Alberto & Santoro, Gabriele, 2021. "Innovation, environmental sustainability and economic development: DEA-Bootstrap and multilevel analysis to compare two regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2023. "Case study research on innovation systems: paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Working Papers 65, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 15 May 2023.
    8. Mohammad Sadeghravesh & Hassan Khosravi & Soudeh Ghasemian, 2015. "Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for assessment of combating-desertification alternatives in central Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 653-667, January.
    9. Loet Leydesdorff & Igone Porto-Gomez, 2019. "Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 189-209, February.
    10. Elvira Uyarra, 2010. "What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 115-137, January.
    11. Loet Leydesdorff & Martin Meyer, 2007. "The scientometrics of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (Introduction to the topical issue)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 207-222, February.
    12. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    13. Martin Meyer & Kevin Grant & Piera Morlacchi & Dagmara Weckowska, 2014. "Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 151-174, April.
    14. Meixner, Oliver & Haas, Rainer, 2008. "New Product Development of a Yoghurt Dessert via E-Collaboration," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49882, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Porto Gómez, Igone & Aguirre Larracoechea, Urko, 2020. "Technological diversification: a matter of related or unrelated varieties?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    17. Jorge Bateira, 2005. "Innovation Systems - Do they exist? Exploring Luhmanns thinking," ERSA conference papers ersa05p374, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Sujin Choi & Ji-young Park & Han Woo Park, 2012. "Using social media data to explore communication processes within South Korean online innovation communities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(1), pages 43-56, January.
    19. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is Flawed: The case of Sweden – not being the innovation leader of the EU," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/16, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Yang Zhang & Dezhong Duan & Debin Du, 2020. "Coordinated Development of Innovation System in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt, a Demand and Supply Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    new product development; decision making; innovative firm; Valencian Region;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2009_009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Torben Schubert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/circlse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.