This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Impossibility of Corporate Ethics – For a Levinasian Approach to Managerial Ethics

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Corvellec, Hervé () (Gothenburg Research Institute)
Bevan, David () (King's College London)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The moral philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas offers a prospectus of stark impossibility for any programme of business or corporate ethics. It differs from most traditional ethical theories in that for Levinas the ethical develops in a personal meeting of one with the other, rather than residing in some internal deliberation of the moral subject. Levinasian ethics emphasises an infinite personal responsibility arising for each of us in the face of the radical otherness of the Other. It stresses the imperious demand we experience in our humanity to be open to, prepared for and impassioned with that which we may not know, or recognise, about ourselves or about the other. Such a demand transcends our intellectual and/or rational potential, involving us in a carnal and somatic bodily experience of otherness. Consequently, it is questionable whether corporations can even be moral subjects in a Levinasian sense. We assert not only that corporations cannot deal with such a demand, but further that this helps to understand the failure of the business ethics project to date. If we are to speak of Levinasian ethics in any organisational setting, it cannot be a matter of corporate ethics but only a matter of individual managerial ethics. What such an ethics would be like is yet to be outlined and, as a contribution, we propose here a series of questions and injunctions. These questions and injunctions will explicate for individual managers some key terms of a Levinasian practice for which we will propose a vocabulary of otherness, responsibility, proximity, diachrony and justice. This vocabulary will provide managers with insights to an experience of alterity and may encourage them to experience the challenge of radical otherness and the irresistible call to a pre-ontological, timeless and infinite individual ethic.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.handels.gu.se/epc/archive/00004614/
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Göteborg University, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI in its series GRI-rapport with number 2005:9.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: 12 Dec 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhb:gungri:2005_009

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Gothenburg Research Institute, Box 600, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
Web page: http://www.handels.gu.se/gri/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Lise-Lotte Olausson).

Related research
Keywords: Levinas Managerial Ethics Responsibility Justice Otherness/alterity

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.