IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04311121.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’influence de l’aide à participer en magasin sur la satisfaction client : une approche par le modèle tétraclasse

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel Nicod

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Élodie Mallor
  • Sylvie Llosa

Abstract

• Objectif La participation du client est au cœur des préoccupations de nombreux distributeurs qui doivent donc accompagner le client pour le rendre capable de jouer son rôle dans la fabrication du service. L'aide est considérée comme la combinaison d'un contenu (affectif, cognitif ou instrumental) et d'un moyen qui la fournit (personnel ou support physique). L'objectif de la recherche est d'étudier comment la présence ou l'absence de combinaisons d'aides contribuent à la satisfaction client en magasin. • Méthodologie La méthodologie repose sur l'analyse de 3 920 avis clients spontanés, collectés après une expérience en magasin mentionnant une aide présente, absente ou défaillante. Ces verbatim ont ensuite été codés selon le contenu et le moyen de l'aide évoquée puis analysés grâce à la méthode Tétraclasse. • Résultats Cette recherche propose trois contributions principales. Elle permet de mieux établir le concept d'aide à participer et les éléments qui la caractérisent (moyen et contenu). Ensuite, elle propose d'utiliser le modèle Tétraclasse et sa méthodologie sur un nouveau type de données : les avis clients. Enfin, elle montre que les combinaisons d'aides contribuent effectivement à la satisfaction en suivant différentes logiques, certaines jouant fortement sur la satisfaction globale, d'autres sur l'insatisfaction, d'autres encore sur les deux évaluations. • Implications managériales Les résultats sont particulièrement intéressants pour les managers qui peuvent ainsi identifier l'effet des combinaisons d'aides à participer sur la satisfaction et l'insatisfaction client et disposer ainsi de leviers de création de valeur associés à cette aide. Ils disposent aussi d'une méthodologie pour exploiter les avis clients. • Originalité Cette recherche se focalise sur l'aide à participer. Malgré l'importance croissante du concept de participation, ce sujet reste peu exploré et de nombreux articles l'indiquent comme voies de recherche. De plus, la méthodologie propose une certaine originalité en se fondant sur des avis spontanés de clients et en adoptant le modèle Tétraclasse pour analyser différentes logiques de contribution à la satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel Nicod & Élodie Mallor & Sylvie Llosa, 2023. "L’influence de l’aide à participer en magasin sur la satisfaction client : une approche par le modèle tétraclasse," Post-Print hal-04311121, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04311121
    DOI: 10.3917/dm.111.0093
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04311121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04311121/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/dm.111.0093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Ray & David Gotteland, 2005. "Mesurer l'asymétrie des impacts des attributs sur la satisfaction : Comparaison de la validité convergente de cinq méthodes," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02023536, HAL.
    2. Boris Bartikowski & Sylvie Llosa, 2004. "Customer satisfaction measurement: comparing four methods of attribute categorisations," Post-Print hal-01822828, HAL.
    3. Jian-Wu Bi & Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Erik Cambria, 2019. "Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(22), pages 7068-7088, November.
    4. Beibei Dong & K. Sivakumar, 2017. "Customer participation in services: domain, scope, and boundaries," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 944-965, November.
    5. Daniel Ray & David Gotteland, 2005. "Mesurer l'asymétrie des impacts des attributs sur la satisfaction : Comparaison de la validité convergente de cinq méthodes," Post-Print hal-02023536, HAL.
    6. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    7. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Kelleher, Carol & Friman, Margareta & Kristensson, Per & Scherer, Anne, 2017. "Re-placing place in marketing: A resource-exchange place perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 281-289.
    8. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    9. Boris Bartikowski & Sylvie Llosa, 2004. "Customer satisfaction measurement: comparing four methods of attribute categorisations," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 67-82, July.
    10. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    11. Nardi, Vinicius Antonio Machado & Jardim, William Carvalho & Ladeira, Wagner Júnior & Santini, Fernando, 2020. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between customer participation and brand outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 450-460.
    12. Chiara Orsingher, 2006. "Le script de service: fondements du concept et applications au marketing des services," Post-Print hal-02023892, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lionel Nicod & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "How should customers be trained in their role as coproducers? The influence of training and its characteristics on the benefits of coproduction," Post-Print hal-03513344, HAL.
    2. Albayrak, Tahir & Caber, Meltem, 2015. "Prioritisation of the hotel attributes according to their influence on satisfaction: A comparison of two techniques," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 43-50.
    3. Henner Gimpel & Dominikus Kleindienst & Niclas Nüske & Daniel Rau & Fabian Schmied, 2018. "The upside of data privacy – delighting customers by implementing data privacy measures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(4), pages 437-452, November.
    4. Junge, Hendrik & Vollmar, Bernhard, 2021. "Autokauf der Zukunft: Eine Darstellung und Analyse des gegenwärtigen und zukünftigen Kaufentscheidungsprozesses von Automobilen unter Berücksichtigung aktueller Trends in der Automobilindustrie," PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Papers 2021/001, PFH Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen.
    5. Xian Ji & Long Shao & Yu Du, 2020. "Collaborating with Local Communities to Identify Improvement Priorities for Historic Urban Landscape Based on Residents’ Satisfaction: An Application of Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis in Dando," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Chen, Pin-Zheng & Liu, Wan-Yu, 2019. "Assessing management performance of the national forest park using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-138.
    7. Christèle Camelis & Sylvie Llosa & Cécile Maunier, 2015. "Gestion de la satisfaction et de l’insatisfaction des touristes : les apports du modèle Tétraclasse," Post-Print hal-01243401, HAL.
    8. Darko Prebežac & Josip Mikulić, 2008. "Destination image and key drivers of perceived destination attractiveness," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 20(2), pages 163-178.
    9. Finn, Adam, 2011. "Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-37.
    10. W. Sabadie & I. Prim-Allaz & S. Llosa, 2006. "Contribution des elements de gestion des reclamations a la satisfaction: les apports de la theorie de la justice," Post-Print hal-01822842, HAL.
    11. Wongkitrungrueng, Apiradee & Assarut, Nuttapol, 2020. "The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 543-556.
    12. Pascal Güntürkün & Till Haumann & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jan Wieseke, 2023. "How attributions of coproduction motives shape customer relationships over time," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 990-1018, September.
    13. Zielke, Stephan, 2008. "Exploring asymmetric effects in the formation of retail price satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 335-347.
    14. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2017. "Sources of satisfaction with luxury hotels for new, repeat, and frequent travelers: A PLS impact-asymmetry analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 107-129.
    15. Henner Gimpel & Tobias Manner-Romberg & Fabian Schmied & Till J. Winkler, 2021. "Understanding the evaluation of mHealth app features based on a cross-country Kano analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 765-794, December.
    16. Han, Sehee & Min, Jinyoung & Lee, Heeseok, 2016. "Building relationships within corporate SNS accounts through social presence formation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 945-962.
    17. Mengqiang Pan & Nao Li & Xiankai Huang, 2022. "Asymmetrical impact of service attribute performance on consumer satisfaction: an asymmetric impact-attention-performance analysis," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 221-243, June.
    18. Dehui Christina Geng & John L. Innes & Wanli Wu & Weiwei Wang & Guangyu Wang, 2021. "Seasonal Variation in Visitor Satisfaction and Its Management Implications in Banff National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Jasenko Arsenovic & Bo Edvardsson & Bård Tronvoll, 2019. "Moving Toward Collaborative Service Recovery: A Multiactor Orientation," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 201-212, October.
    20. Molinillo, Sebastian & Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2022. "Building brand credibility: The role of involvement, identification, reputation and attachment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04311121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.