IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02175960.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contribution du shadow IT à la construction de la légitimité de l'acteur métier

Author

Listed:
  • Sofianne Messaoudi Escarabajal

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Meissonier Régis

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Claudio Vitari

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

The increasing use of unauthorized Information Technology (IT) has consequences that go beyond the organizational framework. These unofficial and creative practices are grouped under the name of shadow IT (Information Technology) and are beyond the control of IT departments. Previous research on the impact of shadow IT has highlighted its positive effects on user motivation and performance, on strengthening innovation in organizations, and on the negative influence on the stability and security of the official IT system. Our analysis, through neo-institutional theories, would make it possible to consider this phenomenon as contributing to the construction, at different levels, of the legitimacy of the professional actor, institutional entrepreneur. This phenomenon would also be able to spread into the institutional field of the organization through isomorphic processes, modifying its logic.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofianne Messaoudi Escarabajal & Meissonier Régis & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "Contribution du shadow IT à la construction de la légitimité de l'acteur métier," Post-Print hal-02175960, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02175960
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02175960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02175960/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haag, Steffi & Eckhardt, Andreas & Bozoyan, Christiane, 2015. "Are Shadow System Users the Better IS Users? - Insights of a Lab Experiment," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82693, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Frédérique Déjean & Jean-Pascal Gond & Bernard Leca, 2004. "Measuring the unmeasured : An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry," Post-Print halshs-00151270, HAL.
    3. Sonia Abdennadher & Walid Cheffi, 2011. "L'adoption du vote par internet aux assemblées générales des actionnaires de sociétés cotées en France : une perspective institutionnaliste," Post-Print hal-00680654, HAL.
    4. Haag, Steffi & Eckhardt, Andreas, 2014. "Organizational Cloud Service Adoption - A Scientometric and Content-based Literature Analysis," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82769, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1478 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofianne Messaoudi Escarabajal & Régis Meissonier & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "Contribution du shadow IT à la construction de la légitimité de l'acteur métier," Post-Print hal-02293768, HAL.
    2. Mahzouni, Arian, 2019. "The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 297-308.
    3. Grisard, Claudine, 2014. "La formation de l'accountability en situations conflictuelles," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/13959 edited by Berland, Nicolas.
    4. Céline Louche & Daniel Arenas & Katinka Cranenburgh, 2012. "From Preaching to Investing: Attitudes of Religious Organisations Towards Responsible Investment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 301-320, October.
    5. Isabelle Bouty & Marie-Léandre Gomez & Carole Drucker-Godard, 2013. "Maintaining an Institution : The Institutional Work of Michelin in Haute Cuisine around the World," Working Papers hal-00782455, HAL.
    6. Clementino, Ester & Perkins, Richard, 2020. "How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103046, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    8. Franck Aggeri & Aurélien Acquier, 2005. "La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-00645708, HAL.
    9. Yamauchi, Yuki & 山内, 雄気 & Endo, Takahiro, 2010. "Happen To Be Fashionable? : New Practice Creation Through The Sequence Of Multiple Actors," Working Paper Series 115, Center for Japanese Business Studies (HJBS), Graduate School of Commerce and Management Hitotsubashi University.
    10. Diane-Laure Arjaliès, 2010. "A Social Movement Perspective on Finance: How Socially Responsible Investment Mattered," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 57-78, April.
    11. Simone Pulcher & Marco Guerci & Thomas Köllen, 2022. "When stakeholders claim differently for diversity management: Adopting lesbian, gay and bisexual‐inclusive practices in Italy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 815-840, December.
    12. Steffi Haag & Andreas Eckhardt, 2017. "Shadow IT," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 469-473, December.
    13. Michaela Balzarova & Pavel Castka, 2012. "Stakeholders’ Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 265-279, December.
    14. repec:hal:journl:hal-00782455 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Marie LEMAIRE, 2018. ""It's a Bible!" Unexpected use, misuse and non-use of CSR standards among "activist" workers," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2018-08, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    16. Déjean, Frédérique, 2004. "Contribution à l'étude de l'investissement socialement responsable : Les stratégies de légitimation des sociétés de gestion," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/10473 edited by Colasse, Bernard.
    17. Mélodie Cartel & Eva Boxenbaum & Franck Aggeri, 2014. "Policy making as bricolage: the role of platforms in institutional innovation," Post-Print hal-01089462, HAL.
    18. Chantal Hervieux & Eric Gedajlovic & Marie‐France B. Turcotte, 2010. "The legitimization of social entrepreneurship," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 37-67, March.
    19. Victor Zitian Chen & Sunny Li Sun, 2019. "Barbarians at the Gate of the Middle Kingdom: The International Mobility of Financing Contract and Governance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(4), pages 802-837, July.
    20. Marie‐Andrée Caron & Marie‐France B. Turcotte, 2009. "Path dependence and path creation," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 272-297, January.
    21. Dominique Bessire & Stéphane Onnee, 2006. "Les agences de notation sociétale : la quête de légitimité dans un champ organisationnel en construction," Post-Print halshs-00548091, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    néo-institutionnalisme; stratégie de contournement; légitimité; Shadow IT; champ institutionnel;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02175960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.