Pleasure and belief in Hume's decision process
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to introduce explicitly pleasure and belief in what aims at being a Humean theory of decision, like the one developed in Diaye and Lapidus (2005a). Although we support the idea that Hume was in some way a hedonist – evidently different from Bentham's or Jevons' way – we lay emphasis less on continuity than on the specific kind of hedonism encountered in Hume's writings (chiefly the Treatise, the second Enquiry, the Dissertation, or some of his Essays). Such hedonism clearly contrasts to its standard modern inheritance, expressed by the relation between preferences and utility. The reason for such a difference with the usual approach lies in the mental process that Hume puts to the fore in order to explain the way pleasure determines desires and volition. Whereas pleasure is primarily, in Hume's words, an impression of sensation, it takes place in the birth of passions as reflecting an idea of pleasure, whose “force and vivacity” is precisely a “belief”, transferred to the direct passions of desire or volition that come immediately before action. As a result, from a Humean point of view, “belief” deals with decision under risk or uncertainty, as well with intertemporal decision and indiscrimination problems. The latter are explored within a formal framework, and it is shown that the relation of pleasure is transformed by belief into a non-empty class of relations of desire, among which at least one is a preorder.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00483263.
Date of creation: Jun 2012
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2012, 19, 3, 355-384
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00483263
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
Hume; decision; pleasure; belief; passion; desire; preference; rationality; indiscrimination; will; choice;
Other versions of this item:
- Marc-Arthur Diaye & André Lapidus, 2012. "Pleasure and belief in Hume's Decision Process," European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 355-384, July.
- NEP-ALL-2010-05-29 (All new papers)
- NEP-HIS-2010-05-29 (Business, Economic & Financial History)
- NEP-HPE-2010-05-29 (History & Philosophy of Economics)
- NEP-UPT-2010-05-29 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marc-Arthur Diaye & Andre Lapidus, 2005.
"A Humean theory of choice of which rationality may be one consequence,"
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 89-111.
- Marc-Arthur Diaye & André Lapidus, 2005. "A Humean Theory of Choice of which Rationality May Be One Consequence," Post-Print hal-00343841, HAL.
- Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, 2001.
"Time Inconsistent Preferences in Adam Smith and David Hume,"
2001-19, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, 2003. "Time-Inconsistent Preferences in Adam Smith and David Hume," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 241-268, Summer.
- André Lapidus, 2010.
"The Valuation of Decision and Individual Welfare: A Humean Approach,"
- Andre Lapidus, 2010. "The valuation of decision and individual welfare: a Humean approach," European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28.
- Gordon F. Davis, 2003. "Philosophical Psychology and Economic Psychology in David Hume and Adam Smith," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 269-304, Summer.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.